“b-but bears are actually dangerous!” Shut the hell up.

  • Lulzagna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    You’re asking for statistics in bad faith of the argument. Seems like you’re the one slap-fighting here - if you wanted to actually engage in logical discourse, you’d have presented statistics yourself, which you have not.

    There’s obviously no statistics on the rate of how many bear-human and male-female interactions happen. One rarely happens, the other happens billions of times per day. We can prove that bears are more aggressive and dangerous than humans though.

    In one black bear study 88% of fatal attacks were a result of the bear being the aggressor. Note that black bears are known to be timid of humans, and notoriously not aggressive.

    So, statistically even the more timid bear species are wildly more aggressive to humans than humans to bears. Unless you have data that proves that men are more aggressive to women than bears are to humans, this is the closest we get to proving men are statistically safer than bears.

    • WldFyre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      In one black bear study 88% of fatal attacks were a result of the bear being the aggressor.

      Lmfao what a useless fact.

      How many rapes or instances of physical assault on a woman were a result of the man being the aggressor?

        • WldFyre@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I would love to know how you went from percentages, which you quoted and I replied to, to overall numbers. You realize that’s not what you were talking about, right?