Splitting Chrome from Google wouldn’t make Chrome not a monopoly, though, right?

Someone else looked to the group claiming responsibility for this. It’s a pro-Palestinian Russian group

LLMs are great for things that don’t have to be tied to facts and the real world. I’ve used it for parody songs or for brainstorming character ideas.

Are there any major languages that actually struggle to be typed today?

So our population has increased by 50% and you expect our energy demands to stay the same or decrease? All countries have increased energy production, including China, I’m not sure why you’re making this sound like a US centric problem.

You weren’t talking about wealth, you said that our energy consumption continued to rise.

It’s almost like our population has continued to increase for the last 30 years

Did I misremember something, or is my memory easily influenced by external stimuli? No, the Mandela Effect must be real!

/s

How would breaking up Google break up the “monopoly” of YouTube, which is what we were discussing.

That all sounds shittier to me NGL

Great counter point

/s

Valve also doesn’t pursue anti consumer goals on daily basis.

Valve pioneered lootboxes and marketing gambling to children, why does everyone forget that?

Lol the first link mostly squabbles over definitions, and argues for natural gas.

The second link relies on simulations and required specific blends of several renewable sources to get rid of the need for a baseload source, which is not a broadly applicable solution. Not every location can have 50% wind supplying power (fucking lol) and they STILL required natural gas to ramp up supply.

What the fuck do you mean by “base load myth”? Lol

Yeah, Marcov Chains are truly the worst thing our species has produced!

Glad you have your priorities straight. It’s been fun talking to a chatbot instead of having a discussion like normal people. You can respond to this comment with whatever responses you want, just know that according to the things I’ve pretended you said, I’ve won the argument.

Are you in high school? You’re making up things I never said and putting a sexual element on your responses for no reason.

Stay in school and learn how to have discussions before arguing about language and technology lol

Goodnight.

What on Earth is this in response to?? Did I say it was a hard riddle?

I concede. AI has a superintelligient brain and I’m just so jealous.

Point to any part of my comment that implied any of this.

I only gave more info on how LLMs work since what you were describing were Marcov chains. I wasn’t saying you were wrong with the thrust of your comment, just the details on how they work. If they were exactly as effective as Marcov chains we wouldn’t be having these discussions, that’s why they can be misused.

Feel free to discuss the actual words I’m using instead of this LLM word salad.

I think you’re seeing coherence where there is none.

Ask it to solve the riddle about the fox the chicken and the grains.

I think it getting tripped up on riddles that people often fail or it not getting factual things correct isn’t as important for “believability”, which is probably a word closer to what I meant than “coherence.”

No one was worried about misinformation coming from r/SubredditSimulator, for example, because Marcov chains have much much less believability. “Just guessing words” is a bit of a over-simplification for neural nets, which are a powerful technology even if the utility of turning it towards language is debatable.

And if LLM’s weren’t so believable we wouldn’t be having so many discussions about the misinformation or misuse they could cause. I don’t think we’re disagreeing I’m just trying to add more detail to your “each word is generated independently” quote, which is patently wrong and detracts from your overall point.

I don’t disagree, I was just pointing out that “each word is generated independently of each other” isn’t strictly accurate for LLM’s.

It’s part of the reason they are so convincing to some people, they are able to hold threads semi-coherently throughout entire essay length paragraphs without obvious internal lapses of logic.

Generative AI and LLMs start by predicting the next word in a sequence. The words are generated independently of each other

Is this true? I know that’s how Marcov chains work, but I thought neural nets worked differently with larger tokens.