• Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    This is goofy. Not one of us can wear whatever we want in USA (and many other countries). All sorts of rules on dress.

    Dress codes for restaurants (jackets and ties required)… dress codes for schools (uniforms)… dress codes for jobs (uniforms)… dress codes for gas stations (no shirts, no shoes, no service)… dress codes for banks (can’t cover your face or wear sunglasses)…

    This is a false issue, used to inflame the dumbest among us. Sadly, it still works.

  • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    A Turkish acquaintance of mine from a long time ago introduced me to the idea of reform Islam. I didn’t know that it existed, but she was a practitioner. She didn’t wear a hijab, she swore when she felt like it, and she wore shorts when it was hot outside. Her prayers were usually sitting quietly and humming to herself when her phone alarm went off. Whenever we did an art project, she’d do this big long prayer to dedicate it.

    Nice girl. Hope she’s doing okay.

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Idk how it’s so difficult for westerners to understand that not all Muslims who consider themselves practicing Muslims observe all parts of the faith. There’s so many Catholics who disregard lent, hardly anybody listens to the dietary restrictions, there’s almost none who acknowledge Jesus’ teachings on wealth. Do all Catholics choose not to use condoms? Do all of them have the same opinion on abortion?

      But I do realize it’s part of looking at the out-group as a monolith at best and a hive mind at worst.

      • chronotron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        it’s perfectly fine to judge the members of a group that follows a set of texts by what those texts say

        • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          35 minutes ago

          Because there only ever is one interpretation of any text and religious people famously all agree on it.

          Because everyone who professes to a given religion has access to, reads and observes the texts and definitely doesn’t just go with whatever everyone else is doing and saying and getting their religious belief through osmosis.

          Because different sects and cultures don’t weigh some parts heavier than others and local cultural practices and superstitions play no role in how people observe or ignore the text.

          Because the text is the only thing that defines a religion and there is nothing else to it.

          And of course because you definitely understand the text by just skimming it until you find whatever verse lets you feel euphoric through enlightenment by your own intelligence.

      • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I think a lot of the reddit type atheists are so far removed from religion in general they only view religious people as a cartoonishly idealized strawman that has no thoughts other than what their book says and their preacher teaches, who every second of every day is thinking only about god and how to be more godly and who believes the simplest interpretation of their religion. I have encountered it quite a few times as well since my username “outs” me as christian.

        It’s that plus for muslims the sheer racism that makes for a particularly potent mixture of arrogance and ignorance resulting in this weird “white savior thats sneering at their lessers” postings

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think this is post is also about places like France trying to dictate that Muslim women can’t wear hijabs in certain places (namely pools).

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      a) that really depends on where in amerikkka you are
      b) this is exactly about women dressing up as slutty as they want which might include not at all
      c) claiming that the US is not a misogynistic shithole is absolutely laughable racist arrogance

  • philanthropicoctopus@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    What a rabbithole to go down.

    I agree no one should have the right tell someone else what to wear, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t a tool of oppression in other cultures

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      You have no idea about other cultural norms and attires. Is the western man being oppressed when he has to wear a tie and suit to the office in order to keep his job? Do we free him from this oppression by ostracizing him or making it illegal for wearing a tie?

      • philanthropicoctopus@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        You know, this is a fair point, but there’s a few differences.

        Not all jobs require a suit, there’s a lot of choice (you could get through life never wearing one). Its also only required during working hours. Not around the clock. Women have been killed over these expectations. Its not the same.

        • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          Women have been killed over these expectations

          Is that really what you think muslims support?? Can you not conceive of people wanting to wear a hijab?? And even if not, why is it so hard to accept that it’s just a fact when they say it??

      • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Is the western man being oppressed when he has to wear a tie and suit to the office in order to keep his job?

        Suits are expensive and unnecessary. Some people (i.e. autistic) might have sensory difficulties when they wear them. If someone is vegan, most suits aren’t so it further restricts what they can wear and they have to worry more about differences in look due to the stricter dress code. Fortunately, being restricted only while working certain jobs isn’t as bad as being restricted in all public spaces.

        Do we free him from this oppression by ostracizing him or making it illegal for wearing a tie?

        No

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Conservatives don’t need their consent manufactured to go bomb people. This is for liberals. This is to make them believe that they need to save people by bombing them.

  • bigmamoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Nobody was ever kill for wearing hijab A lot were killed for taking him off. Your false equivalence is revolting.

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      islamophobic murders exist and people absolutely get attacked and harassed for wearing a hijab. You ignoring the racism in your own country in order to brow-beat a region under constant attack under the guise of “human rights” is what’s revolting.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    It’s like making it illegal for women to wear makeup and thinking you are “freeing them of cultural values originating from patriarchy.”

    I personally would like governments to NOT force a specific gender to look a specific way.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Lol that thread is a cesspool but I’m glad in classic lemmy fashion, its not shadow banned or locked.

    I don’t want to add more fuel to the flames but it’s a case example of why I don’t take the EU seriously when it comes to free speech laws or claims of “secularity”.

    France and UK were out here blocking Bosnia from arming itself during the genocide carried out by Serbia because they didn’t want a muslim country to exist in Europe.

    feddit banned luigi and pro gaza content because it’s apparently illegal to discuss those topics in Germany, as if an internet forum talking about foreign news needs to be regulated by the government.

    It’s not as bad as reddit, but there are some seriously god awful comments on that post trying to justify poorly disguised ethnic filtering laws.

    • Meow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Women need the agency to decide for themselves, and not have the decision made for them by men, or the state. The only way any clothing is really oppressive is if it isn’t a choice, and in that way “not being allowed to wear” is the same as “being forced to wear”. It seems like you are defending the choice being taken from women under the mask of pretending to support the choice being given to them, by pointing to something not even being argued about as the covering mask, like a strawman.

      • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        If women were choosing to wear hijab with out the cultural, familial or state pressure you’d see women doing exactly that from other parts of the world where Islam isn’t enforcing it, you don’t see that because it’s not a free choice being made, acquiescing to pressure isn’t actually a choice.

        • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Wherever you find Muslims in the world, you will find someone wearing hijab. If you punish women for wearing it, you are not better than those who punish them for not wearing it.

          • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            It’s extremely rare outside of countries that don’t enforce it, the Muslim women I know who still choose to wear hijab are from strict families. I have quite a few Muslim friends, most of whom are women, most of whom are not hijabis and don’t support the practice as public policy and find the pressure to wear it when they go home to be extremely uncomfortable. There’s a reason they feel that way, there’s a reason Muslim women who emigrate tend to stop wearing it, because they were pressured to do so it wasn’t a free choice. Is it 100% obviously no but frankly the exception proves the rule here

            • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Do you think it’s possible that Muslim émigrés might feel social pressure in their new homes not to wear a hijab? I’ve heard quite a few women say they wear it for themselves as an expression of their faith. I can’t very well discount that possibility. Of course there are all sorts of social and familial pressures (and norms) that we all face. Many of which are largely taken for granted by those affected, even me and you!

        • Meow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          22 hours ago

          With or without culture it is not your decision to make O Enlightened Savior!/s This thread is so full of poorly hidden sexist and racist nonsense that it is sickening. The western world is not the savior of the world, it is it’s oppressor, and the oppressor’s feigned concern while it eye’s those resources of the oppressed licking it’s lips, can only be inauthentic from such a position, clean your own house before trying to use the level of cleanness of someone else’s house as some kind of excuse.

    • nitroemdash@lemmy.wtfBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It is a type of clothing that many women consciously choose and desire to wear. Some countries mandate it, but it is not much less rational than a mandate to cover chest and genitals in christian culture countries.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      there are plenty of muslim countries that ban burkas/some of the other extreme coverings, all anyone in the west should need to know to support it

          • chronotron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            48 minutes ago

            why should one be made to tolerate an idealogy that says all who don’t follow it should face eternal conscious torment?

            • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              27 minutes ago

              It doesn’t though? Famously non-muslims can get into heaven by living a virtuous life?? I had so many muslims tell me that it’s all good we pray to the same god, or that in the end it’s up to the all-knowing and merciful judge. People who say shit like you have so obviously not spent time with muslims it’s bonkers

  • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Who thinks we should go to war with muslim countries to protect their women?”

    Hands raised

    “Who thinks we should safeguard muslim women in our own country?”

    Crickets


    “Who thinks we should go to war with muslim countries to protect their women?”

    Hands raised

    “Who thinks we should go to war with Israel to protect muslim women?”

    Crickets


    “Who thinks we should go to war with muslim countries to protect their women?”

    Hands raised

    “Who thinks we should end sanctions so muslim women and their children don’t starve to death?”

    Crickets