• blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why bother? Adobe’s pdf viewer is a bloated mess. It takes up a huge amount of space and processing power, and it constantly phones-home. It isn’t something I’d want on my computer even if they were paying me to have it.

    • Cosmonaut_Collin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I had adobe Photoshop pirated for a while, butsomehow it shadow updated and adobe took away my access to using Photoshop without paying for it. That was for the most recent version of Photoshop. I guess adobe found out how to stop people from cracking the .exe.

      • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        There are a lot of great replacements for Adobe programs. If you’re going to spend money, maybe try them out and then donate to the ones you like!

        GIMP or Kita for video editing are solid, DaVinci Resolve is an excellent video editor, and now browsers like Firefox can edit PDFs! Adobe should get bent with their insane fees.

        • slampisko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          *image editing (instead of the first instance of “video editing”), and you probably meant Krita not Kita

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ve found the free editors, including Firefoxs, will often treat an Adobe/AutoCad made PDF as a flat single image. Everything has been merged together. Adobe was the only thing that would let me still treat every line and box and text as individual.

          Any suggestions?

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    PDF is not a format designed for editing. It’s an export format designed to be a middle ground between a word processor and a printer.

    You can bastardise extra layers onto it, but that’s about it.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I use various apps for editing PDFs.

    1. Firefox for quick and small edits
    2. Xournal++ for typing and drawing over the document to make a new document
    3. LibreOffice Draw, also for the above
  • leanleft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    PDFs are kind of nice. but ideally we, as a society, took a wrong turn somewhere when we opted for complex proprietary bloated filetypes that nobody can understand or use.

  • 4vgj0e@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    To all the windows users out there, just use Okular its free and available in the Microsoft Store. its a KDE application and still better than Adobe imo.

  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just switched to Linux and this is one thing I haven’t found a good solution for yet.

    My only real use case is the “fill and sign” features in Adobe Reader. That allows filling with text boxes wherever I want and importing my actual handwritten signature which looks indistinguishable from print > sign > scanned.

  • Joep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Only thing more pirated than Windows products are Adobe products. Smallest violin, etc etc

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    There are alternatives, fortunately. If you need to do a lot of editing, Nitro is pretty good. You can pay about $15 a month for it, or pay a one time cost of like $180 and have a lifetime license. If you don’t like Nitro, there’s plenty of others.

    What pisses me off is that Adobe marketing has people locked in with that “Pro Tools” mindset. So many gullible dumbasses think if you don’t use Adobe (or Pro Tools) you just can’t be taken seriously, and you don’t have a “real, professional tool”. I think that is less true today than it used to be, but it’s still out there.

    (Meanwhile if you need a Pro Tools alternative, Reaper is the fucking bomb.)

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      They’re not inheritly bad. The idea is no matter what you open the PDF with, it will always look the same.

      That doesn’t explain why they’re so annoying to edit, though

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    *opens issue on opensource bugtracker demanding propietary features for free*

    “I can’t believe the devs haven’t implemented this yet!”

    *doesn’t donate a cent*