OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agoChoose wiselylemmy.worldimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up1141
arrow-up1141imageChoose wiselylemmy.worldOriginEnergySux@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squaregegil@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·4 days agoYou can have penis without balls, but you cant have balls without penis
minus-squarexkbx@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoI don’t know if the question should be the absence of, but which would you attribute beautiful and which underwhelming. Would you prefer an underwhelming penis with beautiful balls, or a beautiful penis with underwhelming balls?
minus-squareKoboldCoterie@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 days agoThat sounds like a challenge.
minus-squareHertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoI’ll disagree, source: friend of mine had balls installed a year or two ago.
You can have penis without balls, but you cant have balls without penis
This is wise
I don’t know if the question should be the absence of, but which would you attribute beautiful and which underwhelming. Would you prefer an underwhelming penis with beautiful balls, or a beautiful penis with underwhelming balls?
i will prefer penis in both cases
That sounds like a challenge.
I’ll disagree, source: friend of mine had balls installed a year or two ago.