nifty@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoEgglemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square97linkfedilinkarrow-up1895
arrow-up1895external-linkEgglemmy.worldnifty@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square97linkfedilink
minus-squarelinkinkampf19@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up125·2 years agoI almost thought it was gonna be the same person…
minus-squareHupf@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·2 years agoIt’s prudent to have a backup egg in case one breaks.
minus-squareudon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoWhat if it breaks because it collides with the backup?
minus-squarelinkinkampf19@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoThat’s when you make certain at least one egg is hardboiled. Sure, it may still mush up a little, but better than all that yolk though. More pockets too.
minus-squareudon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoWhat’s really problematic about this strategy is that the second egg is clearly not a backup. If anything, it improves availability at low latency. As a backup, I recommend a 3-2-1 strategy with at least one egg in a different location.
I almost thought it was gonna be the same person…
It’s prudent to have a backup egg in case one breaks.
What if it breaks because it collides with the backup?
Then you gotta scramble
That’s when you make certain at least one egg is hardboiled. Sure, it may still mush up a little, but better than all that yolk though.
More pockets too.
What’s really problematic about this strategy is that the second egg is clearly not a backup. If anything, it improves availability at low latency. As a backup, I recommend a 3-2-1 strategy with at least one egg in a different location.
Howtobasic unmasked.