• daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    You are making my point.

    People pollute.

    That sustainable level that you talk about is primitivism or utopia. I don’t want either.

    Only solution is LESS people.

    Why people have such a hard time understanding that we cannot grow infinitely (in numbers) in a world of limited resources?

    I know, that the core of this is the dogma. The left removed the overpopulation problem of their dogma decades ago to gain support on certain communities and now we are paying with lots of people actively supporting the destruction of our planet and our quality of life just to squeeze a few more votes

    But I don’t buy dogmas. I think by myself. And I see that with that many people there’s not any economical system that could work to provide a good life to every human on earth, it’s impossible, there are not enough resources.

    Edit: big oil wants people to feel guilty for wanting to live good. That is what people who supports uncontrolled overbreeding are, consciously or not, defending. I support that people should be able to live good, and consume without feeling guilt. Again, only way to do that is if we had less people around.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        My only social media is lemmy and Mastodon.

        Overpopulation was a big issue on the left agenda in the late 90 early 00’s.

        It just shifted away in favour of glorification of poverty.

        I suppose it’s easier to tell people that showering with cold water is the best instead of putting up the work so everyone can have hot water.