• magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    ·
    12 days ago

    Not even in office yet, and already making threats.

    I’d like to see Europe tell Vance to fuck off. I suspect that if Europe gives in now, the Trump administration will make this same threat every time Europe does something he doesn’t like.

    Trump will be an unreliable NATO ally anyway, so it isn’t much of a risk on Europe’s part.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      12 days ago

      And this was from September so not even elected yet.

      Tbh it kinda sounds like they just want to leave NATO regardless.

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 days ago

        I get the same feeling, too. They’re just looking for an excuse to ditch Europe - perhaps as a sacrifice to Putin.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 days ago

          Ofc they won’t SAY that - they’ll talk about “what a fantastic savings it will be, to not spend that money”, and probably they’ll work up gently to the point of sending US citizens to become meat shields like the North Koreans and so many others lately. But at each stage, it will always be what “we” wanted to do - it’s “our” idea to do it, I tell you!?

          img

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’d be amazed if he does any of it tbh. Last time he just spent most of it playing golf, and sticking his goofy-ass signature on anything they stick in front of him.

        The last thing they want to do is actually deal with the boogeyman issues. If they did that they’ll have nothing to campaign on next time.

        Most of this will be spent lining their own pockets.

        • kobra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          12 days ago

          This is such an optimistic take. I am very concerned they will spend the next 4 years making sure whatever election we have next is more similar to a Russian “election”.

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Why wouldn’t they try? They’ve done everything they could so far and face no repercussions, why not go ahead and try to be king? A few people will fret and tut-tut but if nobody is going to do anything it doesn’t amount to much.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 days ago

              Well, Trump specifically may not try because the risk/reward isn’t really good for him.

              As it stands, he gets to declare an unambiguous “victory” where he won at life. He got to be president with ultimately a clean sweep of the swing states and the popular vote and served as many terms as he is allowed to serve. Thanks to the rules, he doesn’t need to compete again, and he can stop even pretending to work after 4 years.

              Meanwhile, a push to establish him as “dictator for life” might at best buy him another few years in office before his health will fail. Such an effort comes with high risk, of him going down in history as more of a “bad man”, of personal risk for being targeted by violence.

              Now JD Vance might be game to make a go of it, he’s got decades left in the tank. Of course broadly speaking there’s a balance of power, with those currently in power relatively comfortable knowing that the vote serves as a nice way to get pushed out of office before people get pissed enough to put you in real physical danger. Plenty of opportunities to be self-serving with a pretty safe retirement should things start going awry. Fanaticism can drive people to go further, but I would like to think a pragmatic person with a sense of self-interest can see the value in a peaceful voting out versus having those same millions of people losing their political voice.

        • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 days ago

          The fact that he’ll spend all his time playing golf or whatever will leave ample room for all his appointees to actually govern. It’s not Trump we should be worried about.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 days ago

          This is so naive. They literally told us exactly what they will do, and it literally has “2025” in the title. We need to listen to them when they tell us what they are going to do.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Do you not understand what the word “dictator” means? He told us what he’s going to be. Congress is irrelevant, and if it continues to exist, it will be to rubber stamp, at best.

      • x4740N@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        If I recall correctly countries can’t withdrawl from the UN without their approval

        Problem is though that the un-united dystopia of america could cause issues in the UN

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        The US pulling out of the UN would allow them to pass all sorts of cool stuff, like recognizing and admitting Palestine and calling for a ceasefire, recognizing the universal rights of children, and condemning the far-right, all of which the US used its veto power to stop against overwhelming support on the other side.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s going to be a hell of a long 4 years, for America and the rest of the world. Damn.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      EU countries could start by carryng their weight in NATO.

      Ukraine war exposed EU as incoherent imbeciles unable to maintain a proper security posture, esp Germany and their Nazis nepo baby regime… Straight 🤡

      Vance behavior is out of line but you need to check that bravado that is not support by anything.

      Pay for your own defense and help Ukraine properly… This is your fucking war that was caused by German being a Putin’s bitch. Industrial economy relying on a geopolitical adversery for energy while 40k American protect it from Russia for free. Classic parasite behavior.

      Mutti merkal so good 🤡

      • perestroika@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        The EU has by now significantly outpaid the US, and out-supported the US in Ukraine. However, for historical reasons, it lacks certain items which Ukrainians badly need (tactical ballistic missiles and anti-missile defense, to bring good examples).

        On the matter of aircraft, I should especially emphasize that EU countries have given fighter aircraft, but the US has not. The US is currently attempting to get through the bureaucracy of approving a Swedish AWACS aircraft (with some US components) going to Ukraine.

        Educate thyself here, military people use this resource and approve of it:

        https://protectukrainenow.org/en/report

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 days ago

        You offended a bunch of Germans here. Don’t forget the Americans are sitting in Germany mostly to bomb Syrian kids though, they’re not defending Europe from anything.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          You offended a bunch of Germans here.

          Maybe they will get in their dense authority bootlicking brains that their political leadership has fumble Germany’s geo politcal posture for benefit of oligarch’s who seed wealth came largely from slave labour during the third reich.

          These oligarchs sold German geopoltics our for cheap Russian gas, they obstruct proper policy vis-a-vis Russia because they want a “rapprochement” jfc…

          Nahh… instead they get butthurt… me country good 🤡

          Pathetic.

          In US at least critically thinking people US ourselves for what we are… A global empire with all the bullshit that it entails. Having to dance around German’s sensibilities online…

          Get a fucking clue…