• ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Curious - do you feel a lot of reboots have missed the mark?

    I’m starting to feel the opposite, where a lot of reboots are way better than the original.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      In general I feel like reboots are lazy. There is a plethora of created and not-yet-created IP to choose from but producers continue to reboot the same franchises often ignoring established cannon in favor of “popcorn eating masses” appeal. Reboots frequently result in a generalization or dilution of the original plot with character traits dialed up to 11.

      To answer your question more specifically; yes. Movies like ‘The Magnificent Seven’, franchises like Star Trek in the 90s, even shows like MASH or Buffy the Vampire Slayer (both based on films of the same name) showed that reboots don’t have to be in the same vein as their source content either by a change of genre, a change in timeframe, or even a change in medium. The best reboots have always brought their own new flavor to or take on the original material. But even doing that little means taking a risk and that doesn’t seem to be something producers are willing to do right now.

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The 'Lost In Space" reboot was amazing. They took everything that was dumb in the original show and made it smart. Then they took the one really good thing [Dr. Smith] and made them fantastic.