I used to think I was a 5/10, but then I tried to pirate a game on SteamDeck and I felt like I lost a lot of braincells. Spend like 6 hours trying to fix things and I accidentally bugged the internal speakers.

I think I’m at 3/10, linux (SteamOS) is so fucking hard to use.

I might be the most technologically illiterate Lemmy user ever.

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 days ago

    What’s the scale? I’m proposing:

    1 - able to turn on the device (not necessarily turn it off)
    9 - can train and run own LLM (from scratch, not from an existing model)
    10 - knows how to reliably set up a printer

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 days ago

      10 - knows how to reliably set up a printer

      What is this, D&D levels? Let’s keep this fantasy nonsense out of the rating scale!

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 days ago
      1. Inert object, no ability to move, perceive, or interact with any tech
      2. Root vegetable, largely unaware of technology
      3. Nematode or worm, unlikely to use tools much
      4. Lizard, capable of accidentally pressing buttons
      5. Blue Jay, might learn to deliberately press a button
      6. Orangutan, could make and use simple tools
      7. Human baby, likes to grab things, can use iphone
      8. American high school student, can use electric toothbrush
      9. Chess club member, probably knows javascript
      10. Go club member, probably knows C++
      11. Kernel hacker
    • mienshao@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think the opposite—seems like many of you on Lemmy don’t realize how bad the general population is with technology and are selling yourselves short. Even knowing what linux is puts you at a 6/10 imo, especially when compared to most folks (half of whom don’t know how gmail works).

      Like the fact that we’re on Lemmy—a site that most americans probably couldn’t access if they tried—shows we’re all at least a 5/10 on the technology scale.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Can confirm: I rate myself a 7/10. I know a lot about a few things and a moderate amount about many more, but there’s always more to learn…

      • cloudless@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        The tech field is so vast, most people can’t even list the industries within tech, let alone being competent in just a small part of it.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    9.9/10

    If I’m not interested then you can get 5/10 advice for free just to be polite.

    Skill is not knowledge, it’s the ability and hardheadedness to acquire knowledge kicking and screaming to make the world bend to your will so that the printer will actually print.

    obligatory-xkcd-tech-support

    https://xkcd.com/627/

    • Sasha [They/Them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Yup, getting skills is just worthwhile pain. It’s been hard trying to convince some of the younger tech interested people I know to put in the effort instead of going down the AI route, but I know exactly where that’ll lead them. You don’t get good at this stuff by succeeding, it’s the endless failure.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 days ago

    There is not one single technology to be good or bad at. You can be an Android development ace, a Windows gamer and a Linux user all at the same time, and naturally you will struggle if you switch to Windows dev and Linux gamer.

    Being tech savy really just means that you know and recognize tons of patterns that pop up everywhere (e.g. drag-n-drop, config files in certain places with overrides in other places etc.)

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I do all of those, but I cannot build a modern website.

      Wait, it’s all JavaScript?

      Update: JavaScript just ruined my day again

  • Rambomst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    8/10 maybe more, maybe less. Software developer, don’t really have issues with tech, but put me in front of a quantum computer and I sure as shit would be lost, but fine with consumer products.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Same just about.

      Like I know some truely brilliant people. I’m just happy riding the coattails.

  • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    Between 0.4 and 0.6 but the best humans score between 1.2 and 1.8; we are all pretty shit at technology.

    If you don’t believe me, ask technical lithography questions to software programmers and economic questions to plumbers.

    We are swimming in a sea of technologies and don’t even know how deep the water around us is.

    Fuck the technological complexity in a single screw is massive.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    Are we rating ourselves against the general population? I’m an easy 9 if not 10/10.

    Against people working in IT, or skilled enthusiasts? I’ve really slipped, maybe a 4 or 5 at best.

  • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    9.5; I worked on machine learning starting in 2016 and lead teams working on new cryptography. That being said, I’ve met tons of people wayyyy more skilled/“good” than I am. But if we are comparing to the general public, at least a 9.5

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      The general public and using technology is like comparing speaking with a dog.
      Yes they sort of understand but let’s be honest: Not really.

  • nik9000@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    8/10.

    Software engineer. Respected across a small public tech company. Most folks who do 30 seconds of GitHub snooping are impressed. There’s a decent chance you’ve used code I wrote. Hopefully it keeps working.

    No idea how to use Windows. Or mac. Lots of missing network and security stuff. Struggle every time I have to do python package management. Terrified of C++.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      to be fair it’s hard to be good at using windows when Microsoft’s own documentation is often incorrect

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      The number of computer scientists I’ve known that couldn’t set up a VPN, or alter a firewall rule, or change the layout on a web page slightly, or set their out of office replies…

      Basically the experience I’ve had is that those people you imagine are gods of tech are frequently terrible at tech beyond their very narrow niche.

      But boomers, yeah. Even my mom who was a programmer and mostly stayed current on tech. But when Facebook stopped using a chronological news feed, she couldn’t handle it.

      • starlinguk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        I have an English Master’s and my wife has a PhD in Comp Sci. Guess who sets up all the techie stuff. That’ll be meeeee.

        PS fuck Facebook’s feed. I found out about a friend’s death 2 weeks after she died (her parents couldn’t get at her address book so they posted with her account on Facebook instead). I had to tell her other friends because NOBODY had seen the post.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    Depends on if I care of not.

    Phone: 3/10. I don’t really care other than googling “how to turn off annoying feature”.

    Writing Software: 7/10. It’s not beautiful, but it does one thing reasonably well and I finished it in an afternoon. Just don’t ask me to write a GUI.

    Writing Software for industrial machinery: I’ve done it for a living for more than a decade. Still rather skip the GUI part.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    A solid 4, I think. Sure, I can build a PC and install an OS but both of those have been pretty much plug and play for decades at this point.

    Don’t ask me about your smartphone, your smart home devices or your Windows 10/11 problems, I don’t have a clue about any of that. If you visited my home you’d be forgiven for thinking it was abandoned 20 years ago.

    I can usually figure out basic tech I’ve never used before, but I’d prefer to have the manual, help or hindrance though that may be.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    Hmm… Well… Let’s see about all the things I can do:

    • I can pirate on Linux, Windows, and Macintosh. I don’t consider it difficult.
    • I can install an operating on various mediums, and used to carry a Linux OS (forgot which distro) on a thumb drive with all my stuff on it to use on library computers (used to be poor and homeless. This is how I practiced Blender3D).
    • I have built my own PC, and built PCs for a lot of my friends and family.
    • I know how to bypass admin security on Windows XP.
    • I have and still do mod games, even ones without easy modding support. I do this on Linux.
    • I troubleshoot and fix my own problems, should I run into any. This included opening up hardware.
    • I’m currently in the process of learning coding for the creation of games in Godot.

    All of this and I feel like I’ve only scratched the surface of technology. So in consideration of the skill that exists with tech, the the 10-scale being used, I’d say my skill in tech is:

    2 out of 10.