In January, the New York Police Department’s counterterrorism unit sent out a memo warning police officers about a new potential “security and counterintelligence” threat: Ray-Ban Meta glasses.

The memo directed officers to “conduct thorough inspections of all eyewear permitted within inmate cells” and cautioned that people who have been arrested could use these glasses, equipped with small cameras and microphones, to record inside police facilities. The memo cited two examples of such videos posted on social media.

“The ability to covertly record inside a law enforcement or detention facility, could result in a security risk if proprietary information about cell layouts, camera placements, or officer patrol/site protection routines are released,” the memo read.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 minutes ago

    “If you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide.” Isn’t that the mantra of the police and secret services everywhere when they demand more intrusive snooping rights?

    So what do they do wrong that they suddenly have something to hide?

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    22 hours ago

    “The ability to covertly record inside a law enforcement or detention facility, could result in a security risk if proprietary information about cell layouts, camera placements, or officer patrol/site protection routines are released,” the memo read.

    what a load of absolute shit. the devices could open them up to the legal consequences of their illegal actions and abuse.

    shame meta is focused on equipping the perverts and creeps instead of the blind and exposing corruption and abuse.

  • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    197
    ·
    1 day ago

    But I thought the surveillance state was good for us? Why, do the police have something to hide?

      • Corvidae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Was gonna say just that. They’re all for surveillance technology as long as they are in control. Surveillance for thee…

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 hours ago

      There are a great many cases where people have used tech to catch police in a lie, and naturally the police charge them with serious felonies for it. This goes back decades, and in shitoly jurisdictions is just in your face corruption.

  • GarboDog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    20 hours ago

    That’s why they’re worried about them??…. That’s a huge ass obvious red flag if we’ve ever seen one

    • Seaguy05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean they are providing the theoretical information they would like to hide in the comment why they don’t want pervert glasses in the facility. Whether that’s an honest statement of concern is different.

      • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The police are our, the public’s, servants.

        What proprietary information can they have from us? Literally everything they do and who they are must be transparent and auditable at all times.

        • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Lolololololol.

          Ask them how they conduct investigations, specifically electronic, or covert, and what technologies they use.

          Ask if they’ve used imsi catchers, aka stingrays.

          You’ll find they don’t have to tell you shit and you are the servant.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 day ago

    Remember when body cams were meant to protect the police from accused wrongdoing?

    Now anytime a body cam is not worn or activated it means the cops are planning to or are actively engaging in hurting someone.

    • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      What are you talking about? They obviously just begin malfunctioning whenever anything important is going on.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 hours ago

    For recording in cells, the glasses would be caught by the regular scanners used at various security boundaries including upon entry to custody, at least every time I’ve been detained. Is that not normal in the US?

    I mean, critical support to Meta I guess. They finally figured out a real use case for their glasses. Albeit a very limited one because there’s already hidden cameras people can wear on their body, all of which are easily detectable when they search you before chucking you into a cell.