redfellow

You can see a tweet, but not list of her tweets, iirc.

Steer by wire is pretty much the only cool thing. It exists elsewhere sure, but not in vehicles of this size

Considering the length of your comment, you could have started by reading the article.

Being around someone who did search for something is enough (location, same wifi).

deleted by creator

Revanced with MicroG. I use YouTube 50/50 on mobile and Shield (SmartTube) and if my watch history, subscriptions etc. didn’t work, I wouldn’t be using it.

They aren’t better IF you enjoy most of YouTubes features. Usability is key, and messing around with Revanced manager twice a year has been worth it easily.

Being OS doesn’t suddenly make worse UX better.

Luckily the music pauses after a few dozen meters

Are you daft? You chose one fourth of the definition, dismissing the parts that made you sound like a retard. Im sick and tired of having to engange with autistic pricks like yourself. Fucking take a hint.

The part where your text wasn’t from a cited agreed upon source, but your own ass. God damn give it a rest and take your ADHD meds ffs.

You say you did, but you lie.

You continue defining yet more terms to avoid saying another. You do you, but that’s not how the world works

Your definition of piracy is not correct

But it is? Don’t lie to yourself. We all do it but it’s still piracy, and it’s okay.

Attacking Åland would be invading Finland, a NATO country. They wouldn’t dare.

In all browsers. For like 15 years already.

No. another type of ML algorithm could, but not an LLM. They do not work like that.

The truth is, this is the perfect type of a comment that makes an LLM hallucinate. Sounds right, very confident, but completely full of bullshit. You can’t just throw money on every problem and get it solved fast. This is an inheret flaw that can only be solved by something else than a LLM and prompt voodoo.

They will always spout nonsense. No way around it, for now. A probabilistic neural network has zero, will always have zero, and cannot have anything but zero concept of fact - only stastisically probable result for a given prompt.

It’s a politician.

Yup. They have updated studies, as late as last year, without much change in the outcome. People have been vaping for 13-14 years now too.

My point being, we have studies its less unhealthy by a huge degree, and it’s also backed up by anecdotal evidence.

Whatever the case, if you are a smoker, you definitely will live longer if you switch to vaping.

How much longer compared to no smoking/vaping remains to be seen in long term.

Anecdotally: just about every smoker I know has had the effects of smoking related problems go away just after few months of vaping. No wheezing, smokers cough going away, respitory issues and sleep apnea either reduced or gone.

So who’s paying you to shill?

We’re not parroting companies selling vapes. This is literally 9 years ago: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/e-cigarettes-an-evidence-update

At least 95% less harmful than tobacco.