• Lightor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Are we just going to ignore games that did well and have DEI. What about all the games without DEI that failed. Your logic is flawed.

    • derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It was an example of “DEI first, story second”. The games that failed wouldn’t be saved by adding DEI. The games that did well was also not because of DEI.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Unless you have proof that’s an assumption. Because it can also be said that the DEI games that failed did so because they were bad games, not DEI.