Lemmy has a total userbase of around 60k, unless it’s grown since 2 months ago. Even if every single Lemmy user donated $10,000 each to a cause fighting elon musk, their efforts would STILL be less than a rounding error in comparison to his money.
And twitter userbase vs lemmy userbase is equally laughable.
We’re here because WE don’t approve of corporate bullshit. But make no mistake. Lemmy, nor we, are any threat to stopping musk. Just like Gen X was never a threat to Rupert Murdock in the 90s.
It may piss you off, but thats the reality. 40 years from now, musk will still hold more power than you ever will. He’ll continue to make more money in a second than you’ll make in a lifetime.
And I’m not defending him. I’m just stating facts. The people will not do anything to stop him. It would take a coordinated effort, from basically every person on the planet to take him down at this point…and that’s not happening.
When you watch a hockey game, and your team is down by 3 in the 3rd, with 10 minutes left on the clock…is a comeback possible? Absolutely. But you have to pay attention to the quality of play. If your team is consistantly getting quality chances that miss by inches, sure. It’s entirely plausible that one goes in, starts a rally, and you score 2 more in 9 minutes.
But if the score is 3-0, and your team is lazily drifting on the ice, barely getting puck time, and then abandoning the puck through sloppy passes, and weak shot rebounds, then that 3-0 is everybit as intimidating as it sounds.
And right now I don’t see an environment where society is hungrily fighting for the puck. I don’t see people demanding an alternative. I don’t see people making any progress towards even trying to dismantle big vorporate interests and control.
I see a public that’s complacent. I see a public lazily saying they wish they could get rid of twitter, without finishing the thought process of how to do that.
It would be like saying “Linux has more features and more privacy than windows, therefore it existing and having an audience will mean it will kill windows!”
But forgetting to take into account that just because you’re passionate, doesn’t mean anybody else gives a shit. If they did, they’d already have switched. And the amount of people who have switched aren’t even enough to be worth mentioning the platform exists.
Im not talking about lemmy being generally critical of billionaires, i mean the platform itself and its use is directly fighting against billionaire control of social media, because its social media they cant control.
By being here we are already fighting it.
Lemmy has a total userbase of around 60k, unless it’s grown since 2 months ago. Even if every single Lemmy user donated $10,000 each to a cause fighting elon musk, their efforts would STILL be less than a rounding error in comparison to his money.
And twitter userbase vs lemmy userbase is equally laughable.
We’re here because WE don’t approve of corporate bullshit. But make no mistake. Lemmy, nor we, are any threat to stopping musk. Just like Gen X was never a threat to Rupert Murdock in the 90s.
It may piss you off, but thats the reality. 40 years from now, musk will still hold more power than you ever will. He’ll continue to make more money in a second than you’ll make in a lifetime.
And I’m not defending him. I’m just stating facts. The people will not do anything to stop him. It would take a coordinated effort, from basically every person on the planet to take him down at this point…and that’s not happening.
Sure seems that way.
Countering with money isn’t possible. People need to be mad(der). Barely withholding (or not) violence mad. In the streets mad. Revolution mad.
Had the chance to avoid the violence part before electing someone who flat out said he’d use the military against its own.
Youre only pointing out that not enough people are fighting back, but being here is fighting against billionaire control of social media.
When you watch a hockey game, and your team is down by 3 in the 3rd, with 10 minutes left on the clock…is a comeback possible? Absolutely. But you have to pay attention to the quality of play. If your team is consistantly getting quality chances that miss by inches, sure. It’s entirely plausible that one goes in, starts a rally, and you score 2 more in 9 minutes.
But if the score is 3-0, and your team is lazily drifting on the ice, barely getting puck time, and then abandoning the puck through sloppy passes, and weak shot rebounds, then that 3-0 is everybit as intimidating as it sounds.
And right now I don’t see an environment where society is hungrily fighting for the puck. I don’t see people demanding an alternative. I don’t see people making any progress towards even trying to dismantle big vorporate interests and control.
I see a public that’s complacent. I see a public lazily saying they wish they could get rid of twitter, without finishing the thought process of how to do that.
It would be like saying “Linux has more features and more privacy than windows, therefore it existing and having an audience will mean it will kill windows!”
But forgetting to take into account that just because you’re passionate, doesn’t mean anybody else gives a shit. If they did, they’d already have switched. And the amount of people who have switched aren’t even enough to be worth mentioning the platform exists.
Im not talking about lemmy being generally critical of billionaires, i mean the platform itself and its use is directly fighting against billionaire control of social media, because its social media they cant control.
60,000 x 10,000 is - 600,000,000… yeah ok for someone who has billions and billions 600 million dollars isnt anything.
That’s my point.
yes
BlueSky has 14 million users and growing. Hoping it’s federated as planned soon.
deleted by creator