Shit must look dystopian to anyone who doesn’t understand what it is.
I bet there was a granny, reading it line by line and crumple about where the fucking apples at.
ALL SHALL BOW BEFORE THE DARK OBELISK OF TECHNOLOGY.
My supermarket uses Arch btw.
I’m sure they announce it on their loudspeakers when you’re in the store too.
Oh man I would do this all the time. When I worked a grocery store it had suse and later they switched to windows. Before if anything didn’t work it was user error like rebooting with personal items left on the keyboard. After we had self checkouts that would bluescreen and other than myself only two people knew how to reboot them. If it had arch I would make sure everyone knew.
Why does this produce need a massive digital signage pylon?
The question is, why does it run on Linux and not Apple
Perhaps it runs on a Raspberry Pi?
Or orange pi. Banana pi.
The best thing I learned when writing this comment (because I know there are other fruity labeled pi computers) is that you can look up “other fruit pi” and actually find results. Semi-relevant ones. (I use ecosia, not google/bing/askjeves, so ymmv)
Can a linux/systemd nerd explain what the error is? I know it’s a shutdown sequence, but I’m curious on the fault
These kinds of public errors are almost always a hard drive failure.
It is actually a boot failure. Normally the kernel reads some config from the initrd (the bootloader loads initrd and passes it to the kernel - thanks dan) and then does a bunch of setup stuff, and then it mounts the actual root filesystem, and then switches to using that. In this case, the root filesystem has failed to mount.
Hardware failure is most likely the cause, but misconfiguration can also make this happen. Probably hardware though.
If its misconfiguration, an admin can reattempt to mount the root drive on /new_root, and then ctrl-d to get the init system to try again
ELI5: couldnt open C:/ drive
Edit: clarified what loads the initrd - as per dans comment.
