Argument from Ignorance (Ad Ignorantiam): This fallacy occurs when someone asserts that a proposition is false because they personally haven’t heard of it, or it’s not commonly known to them.
“Well, I've never heard of that” ⟶ Implies: “Therefore, it's probably wrong ornot credible.”
It’s an epistemic fallacy, where the absence of knowledge is treated as evidence of absence or insignificance.
Essentially, your ignorance of the subject matter doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist, it just means you’re ignorant of the subject matter. 🤷 🤣
I missed the part where they said anything other than never having heard it themself. They never claimed that nobody says it. Maybe think about that next time you’re going to be condescending for no reason.
Europeans: “Our royals are sophisticated and classy” shows trashy person
Brave Hitachi: “I’ve literally never heard any human being praise or admire royalty”
If you can’t gather from context what’s being said by these two lines then you should go back to your soaps 💀
You will not find that I have declared any fact beyond my ignorance, and it is rather the imputation of an assertion beyond that ignorance that constitutes the genuine fallacy here.
I’ve literally never heard any human being praise or admire royalty, aside from Diana.
what about the knig of sweden?
Knigge was German
yeah but he didn’t wear as many hats
As long you don’t say the hard r
Knigge please
Compromise: we can keep monarchy but from now on they all have to wear bunny ears.
cat ears ok?
yea sure
Only praise and admiration from very old people, for everyone else he’s basically just a goofy mascot that keeps doing weird things.
that’s the only things a head of state should be allowed to do
Sounds like exactly what a king should be.
Argument from Ignorance (Ad Ignorantiam): This fallacy occurs when someone asserts that a proposition is false because they personally haven’t heard of it, or it’s not commonly known to them.
“Well, I've never heard of that” ⟶ Implies: “Therefore, it's probably wrong or not credible.”It’s an epistemic fallacy, where the absence of knowledge is treated as evidence of absence or insignificance.
Essentially, your ignorance of the subject matter doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist, it just means you’re ignorant of the subject matter. 🤷 🤣
I missed the part where they said anything other than never having heard it themself. They never claimed that nobody says it. Maybe think about that next time you’re going to be condescending for no reason.
Did teachers often hand you your tests face down?
Europeans: “Our royals are sophisticated and classy” shows trashy person Brave Hitachi: “I’ve literally never heard any human being praise or admire royalty”
If you can’t gather from context what’s being said by these two lines then you should go back to your soaps 💀
You seem like one of those people who think every discussion is an argument.
You’re the one using the term “condescending” to describe an opinion you don’t like 🤣💀
You’re the one throwing around accusations of logical fallacy to people not making an argument.
This is sadly incorrect.
Further, I was correct. We notice you didn’t address my previous comment :)
Get well soon :)
You’re welcome to keep digging this hole.
Hey, how do I translate “condescending dickhead” into your language?
The definition is right under “ad hominem” :) have a nice day!
And your username is called an own goal
sorry to take up so much space in your head, lol… not to be rude, but I never think about you
?
Just replied to a comment. You’re thinking too much of yourself
You will not find that I have declared any fact beyond my ignorance, and it is rather the imputation of an assertion beyond that ignorance that constitutes the genuine fallacy here.
You’re backpedaling now because you’ve been caught. I’d be humiliated too :)
deleted by creator
deleted by creator