PugJesus@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoManslaughterlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up1436
arrow-up1421external-linkManslaughterlemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square24linkfedilink
minus-squareradfrog@lemmy.wtfBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down4·1 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareSidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·edit-21 year agoNo im just not moronic enough to believe words werent a thing before dictionaries.
minus-squareSidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-21 year agoAlso: LatinX is literally in the merriam-webster dictionary https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Latinx That doesnt mean that i use it, but by your logic, maybe you should
minus-squareradfrog@lemmy.wtfBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·1 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareSidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoCool, so can we now agree that believing dictionaries are a prerequisite for language is ridiculous? I know it and you know it, no matter how many times you try to evade the question by making dumb accusations.
Removed by mod
No im just not moronic enough to believe words werent a thing before dictionaries.
Also: LatinX is literally in the merriam-webster dictionary
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Latinx
That doesnt mean that i use it, but by your logic, maybe you should
Removed by mod
Cool, so can we now agree that believing dictionaries are a prerequisite for language is ridiculous? I know it and you know it, no matter how many times you try to evade the question by making dumb accusations.