What I find so interesting about painting people you disagree with as a monolith is that it naturally makes the argument you are against contradictory.
One group of people cheers Uber and you disagree with that.
Then another group of people (granted there will be some overlap) decry Uber later on.
These are two different people, but when you treat them as one, you’re bound to see your opposition as being contradictory at best and contrarian at worst.
What I find so interesting about painting people you disagree with as a monolith is that it naturally makes the argument you are against contradictory.
One group of people cheers Uber and you disagree with that.
Then another group of people (granted there will be some overlap) decry Uber later on.
These are two different people, but when you treat them as one, you’re bound to see your opposition as being contradictory at best and contrarian at worst.