• dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ghost in the Shell was an unnecessary remake of a fantastic original animation that was improved by the series that followed it. There was never a need for a live action version.

    • Ghost in the shell was decent. They paid incredible attention to the art direction and casting ranged from perfect to acceptable. I can’t remember a single scene but their rendering of 90s retrofuturism sincerely blew me away. Maybe modern cinema has tainted me but it really wasn’t terrible.

      • Taffer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It could have been an acceptably decent movie if it wasn’t trying to be part of the GitS franchise. As a GitS fan I hated it, but I wonder if it could have been more fun to watch if I was unfamiliar with the series. I remember thinking the same with a lot of movies based on books I hadn’t read like Percy Jackson, the movie became a lot worse after reading the source material.

        • Carlo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It could have been an acceptably decent movie if it wasn’t trying to be part of the GitS franchise.

          Yeah, I think this is a pretty common phenomenon. In the same vein, Discovery could have been a fun sci-fi show if it wasn’t trying to be part of Star Trek.

          As a GitS fan I hated it, but I wonder if it could have been more fun to watch if I was unfamiliar with the series.

          Yeah, this as well. I’m sure I would have enjoyed the Hobbit trilogy more if I’d never read the book. Still, there are such huge chunks of those movies that just feel like video game cut scenes—probably not the best example.