• gigaqps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Yesterday, I matched with 12 men. Only two messaged me.

    Lmao she should have tried running an account for an average looking man

    • boonhet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      “Yesterday, I swiped on 1000 women. I got one match. She removed me. An above average day”

      • why I’m not on tinder anymore.
  • Bieren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Dying. They been dead. Tinder is nothing but catfish, Asian dudes pretending to be females, instagram wanna be models and actual sex workers.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 hours ago

    HOW is this Possible? All dating Apps do is make it IMPOSSIBLE to Find a Real Person! How is that NOT a Winning Strategy in the “Find a Real Person” Industry?

  • HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Everything I’ve watched or read online seems to indicate that dating apps suck for an overwhelming majority of people so good riddance?

    What I can’t figure out is what comes next. Singles events (at a bar for ex)? Meet up type events where your doing something with other single people? Friends try to set you up with someone?

    I’ve been married for 10 plus years so I have no skin in the game but it’s an interesting topic to me.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’ve been married for a long time too and we met on the greatest dating website of all time: Craigslist Personals.

      You entered your gender, age, a written segment, and an optional photo. No algorithm, no matching. Everything written was searchable and published via RSS. All communication went through email. No app, no subscription, and the only ads were sex workers.

      In the context of this article, it forced the user to engage by reading people’s blurbs instead of just swiping for brain chemicals like Candy Crush. You felt like you were talking the other humans and the website was just where you went to meet them.

      If such a site were recreated today, users would want to run the RSS feed through a slop rejection filter.

    • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think the plan is to start approaching people at the grocery store or attending interest based clubs/ meetups, oh and just being single.

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 hours ago

    it’s not because there isn’t a desperate need. it’s that they are predatory and make a hard thing fucking impossible, and have a vested interest in making it impossible and charging for the solution, but not a good enough solution to invalidate needing to keep using it.

    • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I of of the opinion that these sites commoditize women. They take in profiles, they curate and hoard them. They know that men will pay to get access to them, so they put the best “opportunities” behind their paywall. If you don’t pay, you can see them, but have low chances of getting their attention. I presume the same happens to both sides, but regardless of how they operate, they don’t want you to find someone. They don’t make money if you find someone and quit using the app.

      They manipulate a population that is hooked on convenience and pretend to offer the same thing. Be a lazy turd and find a hot woman from your sofa. That isn’t realistic, but that’s the pitch. Nobody starts dating thinking “hmm, I want the chunky person who has no other hobbies than swiping on their phone while Netflix plays in the background”. If these apps were at all helpful, they’d tell you to put on some pants, get off the sofa and develop some appealing interests (no, “hiking” isn’t one of them because you don’t actually do it).

      Good fucking riddance if this is at all true.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    in essence its just to get men to keep swiping, and become the “product/data” to be sold. thats why its dying.

  • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’ve paid for a few to see if it helps - It does and I feel like it was worth it up until 2 years ago when they changed how matching works. But you know what doesn’t work, people telling the truth on their profile. So great, I had better matches or in my case on bumble, better choice for matches based on who liked me. But damn if Jeni from the town next door loved “hiking” when really she just loved watching tv and one day wanted to “be more active”. She also told me she wanted to move to Spain one day… guess who also wanted to move to Europe ( Spain, wherever) - me! But I got the job and she’s pulling the “well not yet!!!” and in the end just wanted to visit and knew I have money to do this. P.s. I live in Spain now.

    Each profile is a crafted (and truth bending) aspect of your life for others to review and I hate how it doesn’t capture the truth of who you really are in person. I went in being honest and found women who liked the same, but yet they were never really who they were on the app. I found my best matches when I wasn’t truthful or bent the truth a tad but yet I never stayed together long.

    Best girlfriend so far, met her organically on the beach because my dog went over to say hi by licking her face. She’s a bit over the top, has tattoos everywhere including a funny phrase on her ass, but she’s the most compatible woman I’ve met so far.

  • 🇨🇦GreenBeard🇨🇦@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 hours ago

    They were a silly concept to begin with. If they worked well, they’d kill their own business model. To stay economically viable they therefore have to use all kinds of tricks and produce mixed-at-best results, and cognitive manipulation to keep their user base entertained. Glad to see them finally collapse

    • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I think, it’s a myth that matchmaking has to be bad to survive. We see that in gaming all the time. The problem is just that physical world matchmaking is optimized to get recurrent customers instead of finding good matches. And that inevitably tanks the reputation. The first dating platform with good matchmaking will be the last one standing because it will suck the competition dry.
      There is a market for good matchmaking. It’s just not as big as the imagined market for bad matchmaking (which we see now isn’t actually that big once people realize that the service sucks).

    • Tweet@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Or arguably it’s the issue with running then as an unregulated business to begin with. It’d almost be better if it was just run as a public/non-profit database service: here’s an anonymised, clinical, filterable list of other people who are looking for a relationship, and a safe way to connect with them. Like all other online services it’d be killed off by bots, trolls, and creeps, but still… If it’s in the public’s general interest for people to be in relationships?

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Let me filter the bots, trolls, and creeps myself. I don’t need a rent-seeking middleman for that.

        (My wife’s pickup line was trolling the shower curtains in my photo)

    • KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That’s BS, the population is literally aging into a new market evey year, but they want to nickel and dime to the point of exploitation their existing base ruining the reputation of the entire industry in the process.

    • Spaceballstheusername@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I never really believed that montra of if they were successful they lose a customer. I met my wife on a dating site over 13 years ago and told everyone I knew about it and how good it was. Many of the people that I told tried the site. It’s a great way to spread your business if anything then through natural word of.mouth you actually kinda weed out people who are looking for the wrong things. Unfortunately the one I used ok cupid was bought by the big conglomerate and they change it so it was just like all the others. The other place I see it working is if governments offered the service because they want people to be matched up. I get people might not trust the government to match them up but why would you trust a company to do it then.

  • UltraBlack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    From my own experience: dating apps all suck. Everything is staged, way too focused on visuals instead of inner values, etc. People get so lost in their and other peoples’ appearance. Furthermore, the profit incentive makes the platform milk desperate users. Don’t ever pay for otherwise free apps. They use you. Give you hope just as your subscription runs out, etc.

    What I can personally recommend: dating subreddits like r4r. Reddit, I know, but the community on Lemmy is too small. You can meet people at your own speed and there is no profit incentive that ruins the platform for users. The algorithm treats all users more or less fairly, too.