What? The fact it’s owned & developed by Google is the whole point
This is how the DOJ is planning to approach dismantling Google’s illegal monopoly, by breaking chrome - the world’s most used browser - away from them
What? The fact it’s owned & developed by Google is the whole point
This is how the DOJ is planning to approach dismantling Google’s illegal monopoly, by breaking chrome - the world’s most used browser - away from them
And, likewise, the UN stating that serious human rights violations occurred is not the same as them all saying they aren’t committing genocide
Is this excluding the bit where they made criticising their war in Ukraine punishable by up to 15 years in prison?
You mean something like the UN Human Rights Office report that concluded “China responsible for ‘serious human rights violations’ in Xinjiang province”?
Parents of kids with peanut allergies freaking out rn
Almost certainly a multiple of 2 minus one
You understand incorrectly. “passkey” refers to a token used for the public key authentication that is used for sign in, which needs to be stored somewhere - this can be stored in a hardware key like a YubiKey, or in your device’s credentials manager. In principle, this could be anywhere, but it needs to be somewhere secure to not be trivial to compromise (eg taking out your HDD and just copying your passkey off it)
In Windows’ case, this secure credentials store is the TPM chip, which is why you are not able to use passkeys on Windows devices that have no TPM chip (unless you use another hardware implementation).
Tldr: passkeys are data, not software, and to store the data, you need some form of hardware, which needs to be secure to not be a really bad idea.
If you’d like to do some reading before confidently correcting me further, I’d suggest reading about how passkeys work.
devices themselves can act as passkeys
I didn’t say a device needs a TPM to support passkeys - I said I believe it it needs one to be a passkey
Thank you for your passive aggressive response caused by poor reading comprehension, though
…except the ones that can’t
I think it depends on whether you have a TPM chip in it
And you can keep hand waving away the fact that lower precision because of less light is not the primary cause of racial bias in facial recognition systems - it’s the fact that the datasets used for training are racially biased.
I think in general it’s supposed to be about decentralisation, but god knows scammers will hop straight onto anything with “point-oh” in the name
Ah yes, those well known non-radical fascists
You 🤝 Trump
Things I don’t like are fascism
Yeah it’s been like 3 years of this plus “but I like when the port is a circle, not an oval!” 😴
But all of those arguments are still valid, even if you make the assumption that it was all an evil scheme to make you buy some headphones
Oh they absolutely do, but ml has a reputation for being particularly poorly moderated
Too little, too late, though, in classic Congress style
The Myanmar Rohingya genocide was nearly a decade ago now, and we’re somehow still at the “asking Mark nicely to do a better job of moderation” step, somehow
I guess the police at least are able to order Facebook to remove it (sounds like that’s what happened) but then yeah, as you say, I expect they will have just escalated to the county/state police, if anything
It’s fun to just give them a little poke and see if they explode 🤷
And a series of words that sounds kinda like a complex sentence when you listen to it, but actually means nothing whatsoever