I remember one comic of hers was pretty tone deaf and caused a bit of a stir:

Not sure how to find it, but it was supposed to be a “imagine if women acted like this to men” as a way to point out problematic behaviors men have, but instead of picking things that never happen to men for the point to land she used things that actually already happen to men. This showed she was apparently unaware the reversal was true instead of ridiculous which, yikes.

That’s the only thing I’m aware of though so not sure about “well documented”. Maybe there’s some social media posts that people didn’t like or something? That’s as much light as I can shed on the situation.

Give the got a break, not all the blood is going to his brain

It is consoles

I personally prefer a 9 or 10, and would rather an 11 than an 8

Oh no, it wasn’t the airplanes. It was beauty complications from tiddy slide surgery killed the beast.

It’s a play on “Dueling Banjos”, a well known banjo instrumental piece made famous by the movie Deliverance

Triplets from a one-night stand is crazy unlucky

Maybe not AI, but that arm lands with what looks amazingly like a standard puff of CGI dust.

Exactly my first thought. Plus it’s especially weird on a bird where the eyes are on either side of the head normally

Excellent point! That pushes the timeline back even further.

I’d say they were already very common in online chatrooms long before cellphones were widely adopted. They just translated really well to the poor typing options, character limits, and per-message billing of the time so became more widely adopted (and some new shorthand created).

Must’ve been off of work for a few years. Poor beaver was headed back after being on long term disability only to find he had been made redundant. Dam

Funny thing, it’s not even named after him; manual dick-shapers already existed, he just invented the automatic dick-shaper and also happened to be named Dick Shaper. A great example of nominative determinism.

Sorry, it being 2026 now was making be constantly think of 2025 in the past instead of the “future”

You’re right, after some further thought I forgot one rule that I use. Will edit to fix this.

To answer your question, the February that had recently passed would just be “February” until later in the year (likely when February 2025 would be closer or similar distance to the past one) it would shift to “last February” or “back in February”. It would be “next February” until the end of the year, then “this February” once into the new year.

“This Thursday” is the closest Thursday coming up, “next Thursday” is the next one after that. The exception is if you’re already passed “Thursday” that week, then it’s “next Thursday” until the new week starts.

Poor Guy, that was his retirement bird seed

Is it ironic that all the survivors also happen to be the ones who don’t understand survivorship bias?

‘Man’ is often used in the same way as ‘mankind’

Yes, which is why without the “a” it doesn’t work. “A small step for mankind, one giant leap for mankind” is nonsensical.

He was saying he (a man) was literally taking a step with his leg, but it was a figuratively large step for the species because of where/how he was taking that step.

The beauty of a time machine though is even if you take a really long time to build it, you can just go back and build it faster.