Yup, that’s why tate sold the worst dating advice in the world while being a sex trafficker, ensuring repeat business.

The public can be wrong about facts which is what the article is talking about.

This is almost exactly what brought me out of christianity. I was institutionalised into it from birth. So, I always just glossed over the most obvious problems that people would bring up. If anything, it entrenched me further.

However, I started realising that I had more love and compassion for people than, not just christians, god claims to have, by their own admission.

How can I love a stranger than an all loving God?

It was all downhill from there.

I completely agree that god came out as non-binary, in genesis, in terms of gender. In terms of biological sex, yahweh is male presenting (complete with bull horns and an oversized novelty cock). Despite their best efforts, the church didn’t manage to erase all the drawings from the early yahweh cult.

I thought they were going to enjoy a slice of cake in the sun.

Im pretty sure I said "the point of it and not that it was 100% ready to go now.

Also, no one thinks advertising works on them. So, I’m sure you don’t believe it 👍

What if the point of AI is to have it create a personal model for each of us, using the vast amounts of our data they have access to, in order to manipulate us into buying and doing whatever the people who own it want but they can’t just come out and say that?

*not to be applied to financial services.

Help, I can’t see my baby. I put them down on the grass and now they’re gone!

deleted by creator

Wizard: I shall also wear armour.

Fantasy lore: no, you can’t wear that.

Wizard: why? I’m going to be fighting too. I don’t want to get stabbed by the first guy I see and die.

Fantasy lore: no, it wouldn’t be fair on the giant dragon or the deamons I’m sending you to fight. Enjoy your robe.

Fake Italian. Olive oil just makes them stronger.

It’s bizzare, you started off by saying “No” in a willful display of poor social skills but then went on to say very little that I’ve disagreed with.

I mean, I didn’t say that each country didn’t have their own lobby, now did I?

The pressure and the money to actually change things and control your country’s entire online media narrative is controlled by a very small number of US companies. They use this power to rig elections and force law like the above through. I understand that wi be difficult reading for some Americans who don’t like that they’re now the colonising Empire but, that doesn’t change that the main problem with sorting our own digital data laws hasn’t been meddling by American business interests.

Have you got anything more than “I don’t like this. So, it isn’t true?”

You say this as if the problem isn’t American corporations and pooled special interests bribing, blackmail and rig elections in every country they can until they get what they want.

But, if people chat privatelywith each other in public spaces, how are we meant to control the conversation and tell people what to think?

No, A.I. generated kompromat-capture is the only possible way people can receive therapy.

Why would the tories oppose thier own bill?

I don’t think you’re fully aware of all the factors here.

“Oh, i see. You want to help paedophiles do you? Why do you hate children then, hey? Of course keef comes out to help the Jimmy Savile brigade again.”

Congratulations, you just lost the media narrative and now all but one paper is going to write about how all the things that hurt every child in the UK is your fault, for the next 3 years. The whole system is compromised and they’re passengers, only a little more engaged than we are.

This makes me feel like they were in a bind here. The so called “online safety bill” was a tory concoction that took years to pass through the courts because of how invasive it is and how anyone could easily bypass it.

If labour want to stop it, they’ll be accused of not wanting to protect children.

Whatever anyone thinks of labour, I’d ask people to ask themselves, if you were in that position, what option do they have other than to let it play out as the spectacular failure it was always going to be and making sure everyone knows who’s fault that was afterwards?

I could teach you but I’d have to charge.

And ghosts too. You’d think we’d all be up to our eyeballs in ghosts videos by now but no.

We all know why of course. Ghosts are just lazy. How can I be expected to believe in a group who clearly don’t believe in themselves?

Edit: also bigfoot: “no way, those MFs will make we work a job. You ain’t catching me with that!”