I have fond memories of the MS-DOS game

They’re communicating that the original post is not a meme, it is news.

And watching an account for a year isn’t simping?

What are you doing watching someone for a year? What could you possibly gain from that effort? OP clearly lives in your head rent free

It’s even crueler when you remember that newly freed slaves grew the watermelon themselves because they couldn’t afford much. Pumpkin spice is a choice of novelty, not survival.

Fascinating, i wonder how this affects music arrangement and instrument expression between cultures

I would like to know more

Very few believed Joe wast the best choice, they just really didn’t want Trump, hence the popularity of Harris despite not being incumbent.

People were also a lot more open to their data being used by machine learning because it was used in universally appreciable tasks like image classification or image upscaling; tasks no human would want to do manually and which threatens nobody.

The difference today is not the data used, but the threat from the use-case. Or, more accurately, people don’t mind their data being used if they know the outcome is of universal benefit.

The issue isn’t the final, individual art pieces, it’s the scale. An AI can produce sub-par art quickly enough to threaten the livelyhood of artists, especially now that there is far too much art for anyone to consume and appreciate. AI art can win attention via spam, drowning out human artists.

The passion… The passion… Is more than i can withstand!

21 is very specific

Exactly!!! If we’re already assuming they served in the military, why do we need any more information than their name? What is the end goal of the dox?

Damn i had that sandbox, core memory playing with Pohatu

They were put there by a man

My apologies, I did not read the article on the assumption Meta would choose the irresponsible option. The article was surprisingly nuanced, and I hope the enforcement of Meta’s policies are equally nuanced.

Isn’t it incredibly dangerous to ban “Zionist” only because it’s misused? It can be used to legitimately describe people who have a vested interest in Isreal occupying Palestine. I understand it’s used as a slur, but banning otherwise normal words will make the discourse much more difficult.

Reminds me of an interview with Mark Mothersbaugh of DEVO fame. The day he got glasses, he started drawing the tree branches he saw for the first time. His teacher said he drew trees better than she did, and that’s why he draws every day!

That’s not the sexist part, you have to read more. One Tweet can’t prove anything, but several Tweets are a clear pattern of behavior. Quoting the first sentence betrays your disinterest.

We ought to normalize this phrase, it’s pure gold!