An old SMBC skit where a couple reluctantly hires a given plumber…who works as though he’s starring in a porno, and demands the occupants watch. They can’t really turn him down, since he’s the cheapest and most qualified in the area.

For real. Nintendo 64 was not a niche hobby, and the games were still 70 to 80 bucks. That’s like $160 in today dollars. It shows, too. We got all this technology, but the care, polish, attention just isn’t there.

Damn, I misread this and went looking for mine like crazy. I need some sleep

What the fuck is the point? Even if you were trying to be ruthless or just protect some rich asshole, it makes more sense to get the guy that’s the actual threat. You can’t look for the right guy if you’re too busy locking up the wrong guy.

I never said they were intelligently designed. Evolution is an iterative, stochastic design process that produced a bunch of badass motherfuckers that stunt on everything else on this planet- us. Our ancestors needed dopamine reward systems to encourage them to hunt and to kill. It is how they survived to produce us. It is baked into our DNA.

I do not hunt, personally. I am disabled. However, I respect those that do. It’s in their blood. Who are we to judge? No one is perfect, and that’s the whole point.

Evolution has given us dopamine receptors that reward hunting. It’s not as necessary in modern society, but nevertheless, our ancestors needed it.

For the record, I don’t hunt. I was forced to as a kid, but I’m disabled and I couldn’t really do it. It was a horrible experience and I don’t want to hurt anything.

That doesn’t mean I don’t understand that others are different. I accept them.

No, humans are designed to kill animals, eat their meat, and use other parts for clothing and more.

When they called the function, they didn’t specify any cells. The copilot function, like any other Excel function, cannot see cells that aren’t given to it.

The second argument is blank, so it just Gave a typical answer to a sum question.

Some ion trajectories involve constant low acceleration. It really adds up time. You accelerate halfway there, then decelerate the rest of the way.

The dawn spacecraft mission to ceres has 48,000+ hours of gentle acceleration under ion propulsion. That’s 5.5 years of firing. But it gets over 38,620 km/h of delta-v (acceleration).

https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-dawn-spacecraft-fires-past-record-for-speed-change/

That’s Xavlegbmaofffassssitimiwoamndutroabcwapwaeiippohfffx !

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xavlegbmaofffassssitimiwoamndutroabcwapwaeiippohfffx#%3A~%3Atext=Xavlegbmaofffassssitimiwoamndutroabcwapwaeiippohfffx%2C+often+abbreviated+as+Xavleg%2CInternet+memes+and+graphic+violence.

https://open.spotify.com/track/56DE2Cjylwj1Htik6HKP4o

They are great.

Most businesses nowadays have a bit of a backlog. It’s more efficient that way, because you can keep the workload at 100%. So my interpretation is that a two week backlog would mean there’s a few other simulations ahead of you in line.

My interpretation is that the two weeks is a backlog. The drag coefficient guys probably have a bunch of models coming in, and they have a bit of an inbox and yours gets in the queue.