

Curious, what does Wikimedia actually invest in besides Wikipedia? It’s still a non-profit, right?


Curious, what does Wikimedia actually invest in besides Wikipedia? It’s still a non-profit, right?


they are a 3rd party and therefore not liable for the bullshit they spout.
Screw that liability BS so hard. You hire them to represent your company, you need to be accountable for what they do under your payroll.
I just hope the past generation (going on two now) have gotten people to see through the gaslighting and we can rise up against it this time.


Education can’t fix apathy. I don’t know what can, to be honest. Community, perhaps.
yeah, at that point you just gotta sell it off. Hell, sell it off half price and you still get life changing money.


only became a problem because Meta made them
Anyone who remember “glassholes” knows this isn’t new. Wearing a camera on your literal eyes is still a step too far in this otherwise compromised world.
But yes, I think the big issue here, as others pointed out, has to do with the nature of the company producing them. That’d be especially important for a place like DEFCON, which is all about securing your data.
The Black Panthers did more to advance gun control laws than any “radical left hippie kumbaya” ever did. Let minorities have the same freedoms and suddenly things need to be toned down for everybody.

anyways, freeuse is kinda what it says on the tin. “Free” to “use” the person wherever, whenever. if they’re relaxig in bed, while they are doing the dishes, outside gardening the plants, while asleep. Usually has some overlap with the ignoring kink where they try to just go about their day and pretend they aren’t being railed ruthlessly.
The post is real. I think they Ai slop was just a weird censorship technique.
Now, whether or not the users on Reddit are bots getting freaky on main is a different question altogether…
Wow. So Wikimedia is really just a small hedge fund that happens to run the servers for an encyclopedia on the side. I had a hunch they spent a lot more on other non-wikipedia stuff, but for hosting to cost almost 2% of what they invest is eye opening. And makes it all the more petty that they can’t pay their labor. Especially since so much labor is in fact volunteer work.