

All you said was “citation for that timeline”, like I’m on trial or something.
I responded with the best source I could find and a summary of the timeline as the three news reports I’d read stated it with a quick search.
You respond back that I’m “avoiding answering your questions” which I am surely not, while demonstrating that you already had timeline source info from the get-go. I’m fine with being corrected, but you’re just arguing in bad faith.
Fwiw, there are still multiple major news outlets reporting that she left after his heart attack, whom have not issued corrections… So fuck me for not being more informed than USA Today’s newsroom I guess?





Yeah… that tracks.