Not in my area. “Air support” hasn’t been a thing where I play in a while. But it’s not a super dense area where I usually play.

I’m some jurisdictions, public urination can put you on a sex offender registry.

It wouldn’t even matter if you’re trying to be discreet and just have to go but there’s no public washrooms around.

From all the apps invading your privacy and abusing your data, I didn’t suspect Pokemon GO to be one of them.

I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic.

Even if you never played the game, it’s fairly common knowledge that it uses GPS data to place in-game elements and to track where players are.

The game also uses real-world locations as in-game “treasure chests”, which people were theorizing all the way back in 2016 would eventually become open to “sponsored” locations. (Every McDonalds where I am is now a PokeStop)

And if you’ve played the game, you’ve likely seen all the invitations to turn on your camera and submit photos (which are tied to your GPS), move to specific locations, walk (or create) walking routes, take short videos of landmarks, etcetcetc.

I’ve been playing on and off since 2016, and I’ve known I’ve been trading data in exchange for a low-cost game this whole time.

I’m not sure if it’s “most [of the] hardcore players”, or “[the] most hardcore players”.

In the circles I’m around, spoofing is still frowned upon.

Most people don’t “get” poetry.

Did you channel your edgy 15 year old self for that? That’s incredibly arrogant and self absorbed.

Lol, that was what the study implied.

If I’m remembering correctly, one of the reasons that participants of the study rated human-written poetry more poorly was because it was “more difficult to understand”. Conversely, the AI-generated poetry was easier to understand.

And this is coming from someone who doesn’t read poetry, lol

It doesn’t appeal to the masses.

Most people don’t “get” poetry. That’s why you don’t see many people sitting around reading books of poetry.

Many people would probably also choose a short story written by AI over one written by a professional author.

Heck, I’m sure comments written by AI generally get more upvotes than comments written by humans.

There’s a difference between a claim and conjecture

adequately explained.

The ignorance doesn’t explain where all the money comes from. So malice it is! Lol

But so do the Stack Overflow users

Why would you want to also make Stack Overflow worse?

I thought it was a mistake/typo. Those don’t instantly become words just because a reader can guess the meaning

Wait, Elon Musk’s ex-wife is now his mother-in-law?

Elon Musk’s dad groomed Elon Musk’s step-sister, if accurate, is more clear.

Elon Musk’s dad groomed his own step daughter…lol

I think you’re having a Principal Skinner meme moment here…

Could it be me who wrote a comment that was slightly unclear?

…

No, it’s couple dozen or so other commenters who are wrong.

Lmao…if you don’t see how going “Hey it’s not actually a crime!” sounds like defending them, I can’t help you.

And “internet tough guy”? Where is that even coming from? Lol

I also think the issue was with your comment. It could’ve been written a bit more clearly

Are you defending the people who used the AI bots as described?

instead of knowing someone in the neighborhood is researching how to get away with murder.

…how would I know that?

I thought they were mostly bots and alts

It’s a lot easier to access ChatGPT than it is to access a flying car