yeah, but it can do really cool things like “suggest a name for my project that does X”.

surely that game’s worth the candle, yes?

while you may be right, one would think that the problem lies in the overestimated peception of the abilities of llms leading to misplaced investor confidence – which in turn leads to a bubble ready to burst.

… bunch of douchebag techbros thinking it’s going to solve all the world’s problems with no side effects…

one doesn’t imagine any of them even remotely thinks a technological panacaea is feasible.

… while they get super rich off it.

because they’re only focusing on this.

big talk from someone with McSwag in their username!

In general, the report found that the AI summaries showed “a limited ability to analyze and summarize complex content requiring a deep understanding of context, subtle nuances, or implicit meaning.” Even worse, the Llama summaries often “generated text that was grammatically correct, but on occasion factually inaccurate,”

how is this being accepted? one would have to go through any output with a fine-toothed comb anyway to weed out ai hallucinations, as well as to preserve nuance and context.

it’s like the ai tells you that mona lisa has three eyes and a nose and her mouth is closed but her denim jacket is open. you’re going to report that in your story without ever looking at the painting?

maybe that’s just the ai’s internal monologue leaking through?

or, alternatively, their lifetime offer has truly been honoured.

solving global warming is really simple: kill off all human beings.

i wonder how long ai algorithms will take to figure that out.

this article is a load of bollocks;

i really love my smart idiot box!

but wait, this may sound bad,

we interrupt this limerick for an ad –

have you thought of switching to our socks?

one might say that this piece of news is the… canary… in the coal mine?

why would any of google’s customers pay to stuff its ads into such a broken feature?

it’s like embossing your logo within a toilet bowl – sure, a lot of people will get to see it but mostly only when it’s submerged in shit.

youtube bermudas.

or build in a return-to-factory-by-yourself feature into them.

how would you feel about an article titled,

“This” word in article titles infuriates internet readers

especially since just reading the headline made me cry.

so, old Wine in a new bottle?

is this similar in concept to the scaled sort on lemmy?

personally, i wouldn’t trust a third-party created app with my banking details. what’s more, i’ve removed all banking apps from my phone.

i don’t need to allow access to my finances on the device which is most likely to get pinched out of everything i own. plus google and apple don’t need to know which banks have accounts of mine.

imo that additional inconvenience to conduct all banking transactions from a browser is worth the candle.

well, if you sever a quarter of X, particularly the south-east one, you’re left with y.

looks like another rebranding exercise is in the mix?

you can’t spell fail without AI.