

I’m not familiar with Tryesto but it doesn’t appear to be AitM attack resistant. What is your usecase for this?


I’m not familiar with Tryesto but it doesn’t appear to be AitM attack resistant. What is your usecase for this?


… It was incredibly sobering that a case about our privacy was being conducted both in private and in secret. So we’re pleased to see a course change here. That said, the battle is not yet won. The arguments to break encryption do not just relate to this specific case and we are having to constantly make the case for why encryption is vital in our democracy; nor does this judgment stipulate that the case will be held fully in the open moving forward – as it should be – only that we can know the “bare details”. We welcome this news but we continue to fight for full transparency here.


Great question! Unlike Lemmy, which relies on federation with dedicated servers, Plebbit is fully peer-to-peer (P2P) and does not have a central server or even instances. Instead, storage happens via a combination of IPFS and users seeding data. Here’s how it works:
Subplebbit Owners Host the Data (Like Torrent Seeders)
Users Act as Temporary Seeders
IPFS for Content Addressing
PubSub for Live Updates
| Feature | Lemmy | Plebbit |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting Model | Federated servers (instances) | Fully P2P (no servers) |
| Who Stores Data? | Instance owners (like Reddit mods running a server) | Subplebbit owners & users (like torrents) |
| If Owner Goes Offline? | Instance still exists; data stays up | The community disappears unless users seed it |
| Historical Content Availability | Instances keep all posts forever | Older data may disappear if not seeded |
| Scalability | Limited by instance storage & bandwidth | Infinite, as long as people seed |
It’s a radical trade-off for decentralization and censorship resistance, but if no one cares about a community, the content naturally dies off. No server, no mods deleting you from a database—just pure P2P.
Hope that clears it up! 🚀


Plebbit only hosts text. Images from google and other sites can be linked/embedded in posts. This fixes the issue of hosting any nefarious content.
Nowhere in the project whitepaper or FAQ does it talk about banning image hosting. Base64 encoding images in the text post is trivial, so maybe OP is the one projecting this intent or feature?
They probably spawned a sub company who will take that over. No way in hell I believe they stopped this practice.


I applaud your efforts for speaking your mind and letting people know of a perceived threat. I’m not sure you’re really asking for a rational discussion on this topic, so I’ll keep this short.
If your ideals do not align with the host you are on, I suggest you look around and fine one that does and/or start your own server.
deleted by creator