yes, decolonization isn’t complete.

i didn’t know that 🤯

and words too. Even words get to mean exactly their antonyms :/

according to the guardian article, he’s complaining on Xitter now

Gaetz?

i’ve just read that quote

On 30 November 2021, Barbados transitioned to a republic within the Commonwealth, replacing its monarchy with a ceremonial president.

if you take a quick look at other news from Barbados, you would understand why ☞ https://www.theguardian.com/world/barbados

it was “spectacular” with Rihanna attending the ceremony ☞ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWbC1H7RJHI

not that i’m a fan. I just remember reading about it, and it’s only been 3 years

☞ https://www.theguardian.com/europe

how many twitters can one man sell to an elmo?

disable JavaScript?

i’m on mull with ubo and i can read the whole article 🤷

me neither. never

“no paywall”?

there never was a paywall on tG, no?

Attacks begin when users are lured into “visiting suspicious websites or click on phishing links that download malicious software onto their computer.”

🤦

wouldn’t it be great if every war annihilated both sides? There would be no wars, if everyone knew that winning is not an option

when dark maga goths rule media, the world is a better place

/s

if this 👇 happened in France, than of course that 👆 can happen in India

The DCRI summoned a Wikipedia volunteer in their offices on April 4th [2013]. This volunteer, which was one of those having access to the tools that allow the deletion of pages, was forced to delete the article while in the DCRI offices, on the understanding that he would have been held in custody and prosecuted if he did not comply. Under pressure, he had no other choice than to delete the article, despite explaining to the DCRI this is not how Wikipedia works. He warned the other sysops that trying to undelete the article would engage their responsibility before the law. This volunteer had no link with that article, having never edited it and not even knowing of its existence before entering the DCRI offices. He was chosen and summoned because he was easily identifiable, given his regular promotional actions of Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects in France.

source

the list of countries you will be leaving is long ☞ https://sh.itjust.works/post/27190154

i’m guessing that it must be like Xitter in Brazil. If a company is present in a country, they may require a legal representation which can be held accountable.

it’s more of a blackmail. Wikipedia could have kept the article online for everybody but they would have deprived 1,5 billion people in India of the whole Wikipedia.

The judge on the case stated “If you don’t like India, please don’t work in India… We will ask government to block your site”.

On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.

from that page i can switch to English ☞ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_News_International

In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi High Court — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Wikipedia — and sought ₹2 crore (US$240,000) in damages. At the time of the suit’s filing, the Wikipedia article about ANI said the news agency had “been accused of having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events on multiple occasions”. The filing accused Wikipedia of publishing “false and defamatory content with the malicious intent of tarnishing the news agency’s reputation, and aimed to discredit its goodwill”.

On 5 September, the Court threatened to hold Wikimedia guilty of contempt for failing to disclose information about the editors who had made changes to the article and warned that Wikipedia might be blocked in India upon further non-compliance. The judge on the case stated “If you don’t like India, please don’t work in India… We will ask government to block your site”. In response, Wikimedia emphasized that the information in the article was supported by multiple reliable secondary sources. Justice Manmohan said “I think nothing can be worse for a news agency than to be called a puppet of an intelligence agency, stooge of the government. If that is true, the credibility goes.”

On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.

which is what’s quoted by OP