Drag’s right on this one lads, sad but true

My LinkedIn feed is actually mostly people outranged by it and they are mostly people who are very pro AI typically. A lot of people get frustrated at LinkedIn especially because they don’t provide anything to creators and make all their money off of them.

Knowing this it seems like a very low quality study. They should probably redo this with multiple conditions.

• Base Llama 3
• Tuned Llama 3
• Untrained human summarizer
• trained/professional human summarizer

If you make enough mistakes, speed is a detriment not a benefit. Increasing speed allows you to produce more summaries but if you still need to correct and edit them all you’ve done is add a step where a human has to still read the document to the level where they could summarize it and edit the AI summary. Therefore the bottleneck of a human reading the document and working on a summary is still there. It would only potentially make it slightly easier if the corrections needed are small and obvious.

Well it can be great at making text too, but the usecase has to be very good. Right now lots of companies in the B2B space are using LLMs as a middle layer to chat bots and navigation systems to enhance how they function. They are also being used to create unique lists and inputs for certain systems. However on the consumer side the usecase is pretty mixed with a lot of big companies just muddying their offerings instead of bringing any real value.