Radical empathy is both radical and empathetic.

  • 0 Posts
  • 48 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 5th, 2023

help-circle
  • I am not anti human or pro billionaire. Your inferences about me are unfounded. I am calling you out for a lack of functional argument. Your statement “Waymo cannot navigate cities” loads the idea that because there Waymo lacks a human there is no variance in decision making.

    Let’s concede, for sake of argument, all Waymo make the same decision every time without fail.

    Let’s further suppose a group of persons learned to drive and were told you cannot pull out into the intersection for a left turn. Now you have a group of people who clearly will make the same decision and hold up traffic.

    If there is no one to inform them and in some sense reprogram this, then they will continue to do this ad nauseum.

    Thus, there is no functional difference beyond your pre-loaded bias about Waymo cars and improperly trained human drivers.
















  • I’ll bite.

    As a math teacher I agree. Phrasing the question with “money” is ambiguous.

    That’s why the important part was showing your work which the student failed to do. Depending on school policy this may be a no-credit or at most half credit answer.

    The major flaw with math education is reading and writing. Very little of elementary school is spent reading, writing, and discussing. This problem is fantastic, it forces students to read, write and analyze. Especially since it’s ambiguous.

    If a student at that age said “Amy has more coins” and answered Amy prior I would take it.

    Alternatively they could go for the formal answer of “Bobby has 4 dimes. A dime is worth 10 pennies. Bobby has 40 pennies worth.”

    We forget that math is about reasoning and justification, not just calculation.