good set of questions while trying to be non biased on certain topics.

for me, topics about privacy and misinformation matter more than ai. i would like them to lean more on helping me identify ai generated text and deepfakes as far as ai is concerned.

i also liked that mozilla study about smart cars so more of that is nice.

thanks! i remember castlevania holding out but the others probably ended out as pachinko bait

can anybody explain the konami part to me? I am out of the loop.

most people agree with fred.

the mask stays on

I think he already got pay-to-search and AI-infiltrated subreddits.

He’s just trying new combos.

The cost is to experience belonging in a group/ social thing with the goal of being healthy. the “crowd-sourcing” fee.

also there’s now a cost to running outside, gotta run for reals now.

I thought I was in dad jokes for a moment.

This is too good.

While the proposed bill’s goals are great, I am not so sure about how it would be tested and enforced.

It’s cool that on current LLMs, the LLM can generate a ‘no’ response like those clips where people ask if the LLM has access to their location – but then promptly gives advices to a closest restaurant as soon as the topic of location isn’t on the spotlight.

There’s also the part about trying to contain ‘AI’ to follow once it has ingested a lot of training data. Even goog doesn’t know how to curb it once they are done with initial training.

I am all up for the bill. It’s a good precedent but a more defined and enforce-able one would be great as well.

I am sure we already got a budget version of this called the jpeg.