In the comments its not just chrome that is affected.
Its apparently all Chromium browsers.
In the comments its not just chrome that is affected.
Its apparently all Chromium browsers.
Better to analyze for vulnerabilities. Particularly with a number of governments using open source software hosted on github.
Mentions UBlock seems.to be fast and safe, but that the API used lets extensions look at everything you do amd can dramatically affect browser speed. Implying that UBlock Origin is responsible for Chrome being such a memory Hog and that they, not Google, are the ones after your data.
What a garbage article. Chock full of google propaganda and fear mongering.
Publicly they’ve stated that it does that.
However it wouldnt be the first time Apple, Amazon and particularly Google have lied.
They state that they only turn on “when you say the special phrase.”
But in order to do that, they have to be always listening and parsing what you say.
And in order to pay for that processing time, its getting processed for any data they can sell ads on
Finding an urn with cocoa in it in a sealed egyptian tomb would be among the greatest archeological discoveries.
Honestly its been years. I just remember the bugs and that they werent roaches.
To be fair to the stores, they arrive in the stores on the bags too.
Also, i guarantee that there are bugs infesting the flour section of your grocery store and they absolutely hitch rides on the bags home
Former grocery store worker.
On the other hand, it’s much easier to miss red flags via a dating app than in person.
Also, Dating Via Algorithms(aka via apps) is hell. Women get bombarded with bad apples and men have to fight through bots and (s)camgirls, and then hope the algorithm on the site even shows you people you want to date.
I never said that.
I said I found the older methods to be better.
Any time I’ve used it, it either produced things verbatim from existing documentation examples which already didn’t do what I needed, or it was completely wrong.
I haven’t had need to do it.
I can ask people I work with who do know, or I can find the same thing ChatGPT provides in either la huage or project documentation, usually presented in a better format.
The article I posted references a study where chatgpt was wrong 52% of the time and verbose 77% of the time.
And that it was believed to be true more than it actually was. And the study was explicitly on programming questions.
A Google spokesperson told the BBC they were “isolated examples”.
Some of the answers appeared to be based on Reddit comments or articles written by satirical site, The Onion.
But Google insisted the feature was generally working well.
“The examples we’ve seen are generally very uncommon queries, and aren’t representative of most people’s experiences,” it said in a statement.
It said it had taken action where “policy violations” were identified and was using them to refine its systems.
That’s precisely what they are saying.
Dude, the entire pad was gone. People in the “safe” zone had concrete raining down on them and the rocket itself was severely damaged from the takeoff.
If they had done the math before that, they would have never attempted that launch.
There are a lot of people, including google itself, claiming that this behaviour is an isolated and basically blamed users for trolling them.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd11gzejgz4o
I was working on the concept of “hallucinations” being things returned that are unrelated to the input query, not directly part of the model as with the glue-pizza.
If something is going to blow up, its much better to happen on a test stand than on an actual product or test launch.
Best case would be doing the math beforehand, as they Didn’t do with the flame trench iterations until the water pump system was added. And we know that because other people on youtube did do the math and determined even the special high temperature concrete from NASA wasnt going to be enough by itself.
Google was always incorrectly viewed as a paragon.