What was the command again for having such nicely colored output?
What was the command again for having such nicely colored output?
Because it’s a visitor center and not a crater center, duh.
Here you go: https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/unix.errors.html
(% represents the csh, $ represents the bourne shell)
% "How poorly would you rate the Unix (so-called) user interface?
Unmatched ".
% rm congressional-ethics
rm: congressional-ethics nonexistent
% ar m God
ar: God does not exist
% [Where is Jimmy Hoffa?
Missing ].
% ^How did the sex change^ operation go?
Modifier failed.
% If I had a ( for every $ Congress spent, what would I have?
Too many ('s.
%make love
Make: Don't know how to make love. Stop.
% sleep with me
bad character
% got a light?
No match.
% man: why did you get a divorce?
man:: Too many arguments.
% ^What is saccharine?
Bad substitute.
% \(-
(-: Command not found.
% sh
$ PATH=pretending! /usr/ucb/which sense
no sense in pretending
$ drink <bottle; opener
bottle: cannot open
opener: not found
$ mkdir matter; cat >matter
matter: cannot create
Or, in a System V (att) universe:
$ cat "can of food"
cat: cannot open can of food
Does the christian edition have daemons though
Linux: Of course you can use these syscalls designed in the 70s. Windows: Compatibility with what? No, you must use these newly-designed functions that exist only on windows. It’s for your own protection.
Tell me again how proprietary software gives a shit about compatibility.
Les Gueaux