im_fine_sandy

Guaranteed, the soap is made somewhere in Asia, the bottles are made in mexico, admin accounting and marketing is in south america or south east asia, but there’s a shed somewhere in the US with a machine that pours soap into bottles and screws the top on.

Actually this is really common.

In areas with unreliable power, powdered milk is much more common. People often do mix it super thick and spread it on bread.

Obviously not a balanced diet but you could do a lot worse for a cheap meal.

WDYM “that was recalled recently”? How would that work?

Isn’t this meat going to be available long term?

I had thought they didn’t disclose the origin simply because their abatoirs are not compliant with US standards.

Quite right.

Almost certainly misleading, but the underlying truth is that shits fucked

Certainly not always.

I think what that teacher was really getting at is things like electrical standards, phone networks, things like that.

I think most western countries could say that about each other.

Yes, there are shitty landlords in Australia. However, I’ve never encountered mould or a landlord that wouldn’t make appropriate repairs.

I’m sure there are shitty landlords in Canada, and every other country.

Some 35 years ago my 3rd grade teacher explained to us little Aussie battlers… That through history we have usually had a chance to observe what hasn’t worked in the US and improve our own implementation.

I can imagine a future in which these become more common in the US than ridiculous US trucks.

Americananas

Dude its a joke.

Its funny because it references the mysterious origin of the meat.

That doesn’t make it true though, obviously.

Because a CEO is a specific thing with a specific meaning that just isn’t relevant here. It’s laden with human meaning that is irrelevant to a statistical model.

Really you’re trying to say that the bots coordinated their efforts, and perhaps one of them was delegating tasks.

This type of structure is very common in tech, in load balancers or queues of service workers, containers and hypervisors, et cetera.

Power structures that seem logical and efficient to humans are not so for a gen AI model. If everyone knows what needs to be done and no one has any ego or character traits to manage, then everyone can simply perform the next task as it arises.

Its absolutely absurd to suggest that the bots elected a CEO.

Gen AI is not going to replace humans.

What are you trying to say?

Why are you even using the term CEO?

Still lost sorry.

What?

I basically just don’t believe you, and can’t be bothered looking.

elected a CEO and power structure to coordinate hacking, and encrypted their comms

You’re anthropomorphizing a statistical model. It’s laughable to suggest they “elected a CEO and power structure”.

The Hugging Face incident story was truly unbelievable if you read / watch the details

It didn’t really seem that way? Leaving containment seemed more like a configuration oversight than a skill on the part of the model. Accessing HF involved an 0-day but the commentary I saw didn’t indicate that it was a next generation hack.

Given that AI exists, and can scan or otherwise find vulnerabilities, maintainers must do so because threat actors inevitably will.

It remains to be seen whether the whole race will improve security generally? I imagine not?