If it is based around link preview vector, then any platform is suceptible.

Couchfucker said we cannot band The Dipshit

Jetsons theme starts playing

Because they are expensive. More importantly, how often does the function of a button is changed? Top right corner button on android is usually a back button (arrow/ x) or a profile icon. How often does a bottom navigation in an app change? Dashboard is an app that rarely changes.

I will do you one better. The screen in the button goes out. If the button changes the display based on the context, what does the button do? Is software responsible to recognize it cannot display an action and do something? What does it do? Should the user be responsible to remember what does the button do based on the context? This article is about return to physical buttons because they are reliable. Do you see any button on your cars dashboard that is unlabeled? Do you remember looking up in a manual what a weirdly iconed button does? On any piece of hardware.

This is from users perspecrtive alone.

Lets do the manufacturer. Imagine that screen buttons have SKUs. Dashboards have SKUs. Screen buttons have versioned drivers. Screen buttons need power delivery. Data lanes on pcbs. And fuck else.

Now imagine that you have a physical button. It costs cents. It closes one lane. Maybe needs power for a led.

Who the fuck wants screen buttons?

Finally. What the fuck multiple screen buttons solve that a single screen that can be any number of any buttons couldnt?

Because sure as fuck they wont solve for context, clarity and reliablity.

Physical books have no safeguards from photocopying.

I have more terrifying news about museums. We are talking pictures worth MILLIONS just waiting to be photographed.

Spoken like a true non-developer.

He is fronting money for development. Which is not cheap.

Once dev cost stabilizes, I would love to have a better split for artists.

lol sorry cant retrain the model to remove it.

Choice becomes much, much harder once you listen to accounts about CSAM. Darknet Diaries has a few episodes on this. Some accounts are stomach churning. You can see reasoning of people pushing for the laws

And I agree. Education would go a long way. Much further than some ID verification.

But, see, education makes people smarter. What if people see through the lies of politicians?!

Both politicians and agencies are drooling at the thought of such laws. Because no one answers one simple aspect the people want answered. Who watches the watchers? Who are they accountable to?

There is no soul in there. God did not create it. Here you go, religion serving power again.

Lets see Courts opinion on AI LLMs.

Alternative title for this year Google I/O: AI vomit. You can watch Verge’s TL;DW video on Google I/O. There is no panel that did not mention AI. Most of it is “user centric”.

AI can deliver and gather ad data. The bread and butter for Google.

As to how it relates to the quote. It is up to Google to make it as truthful as they want it to be. And given ads is their money driver.

They do not have any comprehension of the truth or untruth of what they are saying, and this means that when they say things that are true, they do not understand why those things are true.

Which can be beautifully exploited with sponsored content.

See Google I/O '24.

No it won’t. Yall never be successful with this kind of thinking.

Incantation works only AFTER blood offering of 1k of employees. Fire first, bonus later.
Then and only then Mamona will be happy to improve stock.

Yes. Everyone agrees.

Excuse me, can I get some more pepper for this troll dish?

And that horse will be using arch btw.