• 0 Posts
  • 480 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 7th, 2024

help-circle



  • But the only times you hear of them is when people are trying to get more folk implied

    Yes, and that’s plain old recrutiment/advertising of their cause. Proselytization refers to trying to convert someone to a religion, which they don’t do.

    It’s much closer to putting up advertisement against advertisement.

    Correct.

    That’s not true. It’s a bunch of for-profit organizations coupled with a recognized nonprofit

    Yes, so an NGO. Where did I say they are a non-profit?


  • We don’t like religious symbols in public space, so let’s put more of these, yay!

    Yeah, they try to put non-religious things instead like cool Dante’s inferno statues. End result is that the religious symbols are banned, or if they aren’t, that there are other non-religious symbols around them. As much as they are a religion legally, they are atheists and their symbols are not religious, just fancy branding.

    Proselytism is bad, so we need to recruit more people to fight it.

    Yeah, what’s weird about that? Fire is bad so we need to recruit more firefighters to fight it. TST does not proselytize, as they don’t try to convert you into any religion. The are just an NGO.





  • But imagine the outrage if a terrorist group actually marked their payments like this – maybe the day before their suicide attack – with the thought that what does it matter anyway they won’t be here to be investigated.

    And the bank didn’t investigate. The bank would be fined to hell and back and lose all trust, because they couldn’t do “the bare minimum” in finding something this obvious.








  • Exactly, you see thousands of irrelevant ads every day and think nothing of it, then when 1 time an ad gets lucky, you will use it as proof “they are listening” forever after.

    I had the same thing happen with billboards. I learned about some new thing I have never heard about before, and wouldn’t you know it shortly after I saw a billboard selling it. The ad companies must be on top of their game, they are nor only listening to everything I say, they can print and install a whole billboard on the side of a building within minutes just before I go here.


  • Yeah, but that malware flappy bird clone does need to ask for the microphone permission, and the clueless user does need to click agree, that yes they want Free Flappy Bird 100% Legit Pro to have access to their microphone. Yes it happens. But that’s not what people mean they say that you should use a flip phone and get the battery out when you are not using it otherwise it’s listening to you. No it’s not listening to you unless you explicitly gave an app permission to listen to you.




  • Then what did you mean when you said:

    the output will always be in the public domain

    It seems to me like a pretty clear statement.

    I’m saying that the rewrite of chardet infringes on the copyright of the original work. That is neither MIT licensed nor public domain. It’s illegally reproduced and distributed copyrighted work.

    That I never disputed, I’m not interested about chardet or whatever happened here, I’m interested about your comment that LLM output is always public domain, and if so, whether it could be used to achieve the goal of reimplementing a library so that it achieves the same purpose but isn’t bound by the original license, if you do it without infringing on the copyright of the original work.