It’s obviously subjective. To me this car just looks like a generic expensive car. Looks the same like every other car.

I don’t know, I think it looks cool.

Completely impractical, shitty car built by a Nazi that nobody should even consider buying. But in terms of looks alone I like it. I’d gladly drive one in, e.g. a video game (if the look wasn’t associated with Musk, unfortunately it’s tainted now), or watch a movie where it’s the weird vehicle the superhero uses.

Why would you build a car looking like that in the real world I have no idea, but it looks cool.

Maybe they did, that’s how they got to 99%. The remaining issues are so intricate/complex the LLM just can’t solve them no matter how many test cases you give it.

My YouTube only shows videos from channels I subscribed to. And I don’t think I subscribed to any new YouTube channels since AI even became a thing. How are people having this problem?

Do you browse the homepage or something? And if so why?

It’s pretty ok in some European countries

It’s a feature on Pixel phones

Makes me think, how much water would be needed to extinguish the Sun? I’m guessing a lot more than of it was a ball of fire, which would already take more than exists on Earth.

The OCR is offline, using Tesseract, there is nothing online about it.

It only activates when you press a button, so there is nothing to turn off either.

There is also a 3D spinning globe, so that too.

But, background is dynamic. You can see it has some kind of fancy moving dots. It’s totally unnecessary, but clearly WebGL was used for that.

It was not screenshots. The entire point of the Death Stranding thing was that you had a live camera feed of a face that passes the “liveliness” checks that prevent you from using static pictures.

Steam has many features that can be looked at separately, but at its core it’s a package manager. So I would argue an open source alternative comes preinstalled with any Linux distro.

You can find, install, and update games with e.g. Discover or Synaptic.

I don’t think many Steam users would consider them viable alternatives though.

Isn’t “viable” subjective though? If you are allowed to deem open source games not viable, then isn’t it a bit hypocritical to judge people for deeming open source browsers not viable, for their personal criteria?

Yeah, just like Steam and World of Warcraft, don’t you use them? What’s your point? Should I leave a similar comment under the Steam guide you posted?

I personally think it’s a little more nuanced than open source = always good, proprietary = always bad.

Indiana Jones 5 was fine though

Yeah absolutely, Discord is terrible for privacy either way. What I’m saying is that the verification “requirement” is not actually required for what I would presume the majority of people use Discord for.

Yeah, except it’s not like you get to choose. If you are on the Discord server for rock climbing in your country, you can leave the community, but you don’t have “other options”.

It’s not like the question is “what platform do I want to use for X?”. The question is “The X community uses Discord, do I want to be in it or not?” And of course you can choose to not join, but you don’t have an option to choose another app.

Here in the UK Discord has been requiring this for a while already. I never did the verification, because I don’t access any NSFW Discord servers anyway. Unless you use Discord for porn (or speak on “stages”, whatever they are), there is no reason to do the verification.

Thank you for your account deletion request. For your safety, we have to confirm you are the owner of the account you are trying to delete. Please upload your government ID below.

This was my experience. Every time people suggest it as a Discord alternative I’m like, have you actually tried it? I hate Discord as much as the next guy but Matrix doesn’t get anywhere close. I tried really hard to like it and give it a chance, but no.