all the downvotes confirm the ccp is here

Not all who disagree with you are paid by a government. Sometimes people just think your take is bad.

I personally think it’s good that the USA did it back then and I think it’s good that China does it now.

Independence and wealth for all.

Am I misreading their comment or is everyone else? The top level comment said “The love of a woman pales in comparison to …”, meaning the love of a woman is less valuable. The gp comment says " clearly you’re not married". Since they’re arguing against the top level comment, they are arguing against the love of a woman being less valuable. So they’re saying the love of a woman is more valuable. So they’re saying “wife good”.

One was awarded over 7 times as much in damages as the other.

Everyone is a potential rapist

Indeed, since freely speaking had consequences.

they never said you are completely free of consequences

Who are “they”?

american free spech has limits, it really only protects you when criticizing the government

“Free speech only when talking about the government” is very different from “free speech”.

I should have been more clear that I’m not talking about a nazi rally in any arbitrary context, but specifically one in nazi germany.

That doesn’t make sense. If someone at a Nazi rally shouted “actually Jews are alright” and got arrested for it, would you say that’s compatible with free speech? Because while they might have experienced consequences, “free speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences”, so since they were able to say what they intended to they had free speech?

Some duplicates, some odd ones (why is Olaf Scholz in there?)

Why not?

If you think the political message isn’t core to that movie then, well, you’re one of the dipshits being discussed

No need to be rude.

I didn’t watch fight club. I have no idea what it’s about. If it is intended to educate people on political issues, great. If it is intended to entertain and only discusses political issues subtly in the background, great. If it is intended to entertain, but fails at doing so because of presenting a political message in a manner that hinders entertainment, not great.

said by people who only know of this because today we talk about that message

So what you’re saying is that those games didn’t shove their message down people’s throat while modern games do? That while they did have a political message, they didn’t make it core to the experience and presented it in a way that allowed people who only wanted to play to completely ignore it?

You are validating the above comment’s point.