Not that I think your device has the same danger because water captured from the air will likely quickly be released again into the same air, but I think this is not a very good example of the safety of your device:

It’s similar thing to taking water from a river. If we take all the water from a river, can we dry up downstream? Yes!

We can and we do. The Colorado and the Yellow river no longer consistently reach the ocean.

You talk as if DEI has tipped the scales in the other direction because you experienced a few inconveniences, but in reality it’s not enough to balance them. You’re only talking about what you experience, but you have no thought for others. Which I actually can understand, it’s hard to relate to things you don’t experience and probably not even see (I don’t), but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist.

Lol no you’re not getting the short end of the stick. Yes, DEI shouldn’t be a thing in an ideal world, but we don’t live in an ideal world and white privilege is still a thing basically anywhere in the world.

Privilege maybe?

Don’t threaten me with a good time

What’s next? Windows renamed to Windows Copilot?

99% of flat earthers are just trolling, I refuse to believe anything else

The world has really gone to shit if the cryptobrowser is our only hope

I’m realistic and know I won’t do it any better than Bitwarden. I could make regular backups of my vault and store them on different locations. That won’t hurt, but I also have a life.

If you trust them so less, do you trust them to write software which won’t silently your data? Do you have several offsite backups at different locations? Do you test your backups?

It’s not worse than any other self hosted system, the fact your vault is on every device might be useful if you don’t have a connection, but IMO it doesn’t really add any value in terms of backup.

I’m glad the option exists, but I don’t self host and pay Bitwarden €12 per year. For that price I can’t set up a more reliable system than they can even if I would consider my time free

If you don’t do off-site backups there’s no recovery from your house burning down.

Exactly my point and exactly the opposite of what you said earlier.

What do you mean? If my house burns down the chance all my devices went up in flames is high. This is one of the reasons I’m not self hosting Bitwarden.

Unless your phone also burns down together with the house, which is not unlikely

And Buddhist symbols 卍 卐

The user land API/ABI is stable to a fault in Linux. The kernel API/ABI is unstable

It’s the other way around. The kernel API stable to a fault, the kernel ABI isn’t. If your application only relies on the kernel API you won’t have many compatibility issues. If you rely on userland stuff such as C++ stdlib, GTK, QT, Python, … Good luck.

Version numbers are meaningless. Yes it’s mostly fixes, but in every release which doesn’t have p in the version number there’s at least two or three things which are not fixes. As late as 2023 one of those changes did introduce a local privilege escalation: https://www.wiz.io/vulnerability-database/cve/cve-2025-32463 which was undetected for two years. For a critical piece of software with the maturity of sudo, I call that pretty concerning.

Here’s an interesting report from Google about rust vs C++ in Android: https://security.googleblog.com/2025/11/rust-in-android-move-fast-fix-things.html?m=1

I would say yes is it developed, this is more than just big fixes : https://github.com/sudo-project/sudo/releases

No huge changes of course, but the big CVE from July was only introduced 2 years ago.

My biggest question is, why is something like sudo still developed and not finished and in maintenance mode?

Sudo is being actively developed and has several fairly recent CVEs, some of which are memory issues (at least recent compared to how old sudo is). Apart from being memory safe rust is also better at error handling than C.

IMO best would be to reduce attack surface by using a memory safe language and also reducing complex features like OpenBSD’s doas does.

https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-15714/Sudo-Project.html?page=1&order=3

The thing which makes digital chips so much better than analog chips is something both you and the article are missing: noise. A digital chip is very robust against noise, as long as the noise in one step isn’t too big so it causes a bitflip immediately the stable configuration will pull the voltage level back and no information is lost. Not so with analog logic, since the information is continuous every step which introduces noice (which is basically every step) will cause loss of information. Go a few levels of logic deep and all you’ve got left is noise.

It does https://immich.app/blog/immich-product-keys

But as far as I understand the key doesn’t really go anywhere, it’s just a fancy way to suggest a donation. (And there’s nothing unethical about using FOSS without paying or contributing back in any way)