• 1 Post
  • 46 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 20th, 2020

help-circle


  • False. If you want to tell how things works, get your facts right!

    All data sent to Telegram’s servers will be encrypted once they reach the servers. With other words, the messages and media and other files, will be sent in “plain text” over HTTPS only when using Cloud Chat. In Secret Chat, MTProto is (based on how E2EE works) as safe as what Signal Protocol is.

    But nothing will be stored in plain text, no matter what you use (Cloud Chat or Secret Chat).

    But(!) since the source code for MTProto is closed, we don’t know how it really works, and if we can trust their FAQ or not.

    I trusted Telegram at first, but I don’t trust it 100% anymore (still better than SMS). Am using my own Snikket server these days. Much safer with a lot of 😌😊😍😃 moments, even today, maybe a year later. Especially with OMEMO (Signal Protocol).






  • Yeah. Let say Signal goes down because of Big Tech and lets say that 50% of their users use Signal as their only messaging app. What will happen then? Hysteria!

    No, XMPP all the way for me until Signal becomes decentralized with zero external connections and when they also have removed the phone number requirement.


  • airikr@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlWhy Signal over Jabber/XMPP?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    I totally agree with you. But!

    But Signal from what I’ve heard really wants us to use their server.

    Signal doesn’t have their own servers. Instead, they rent servers from 4 companies, 3 of them is Google, Amazon, and Microsoft. So Signal is relying on Big Tech and if Big Tech decides that enough is enough, they can easily shut Signal down.

    THAT is what I find most terrifying. And why not use their own server? Not enough money, but they are working on it (good).

    And to make it a little bit worst: Signal depends on a third party company for sending out SMS. Your phone number is therefore handled by not Signal, but by yet another company, highly likey an American company. And they are against privacy invading companies at the same time they are one. Oh, the irony.

    You want sources? Sure.

    Don’t get me wrong, I absolutely love the idea of Signal. But there is flaws that makes Signal more privacy invading than privacy friendly.









  • I find the quality very good. And there’s no problems with setup a “server” :)

    1. Go to the preferred Jitsi Meet server.
    2. Enter the meeting name (as it really called) or just press enter to get a random name.
    3. Enter your details and options (mainly mic on/off and webcam on/off).
    4. Enter the meeting. If you’re the first one in it, you’re the moderator.

    Once inside and as a moderator, you can create so called breakout rooms. These works just like subchannels in Discord. If you’re many people in 1 call, you can create these to create a more calmer experience. I have personally not tried these out since I have only talked to 1-2 people.

    Mumble is a excellent VoIP software, but like you said, screen sharing is not possible since Mumble is just what VoIP means: voice over IP.



  • I live under a rock most of the time, so welcome to the club. What I know of, the leaks are screenshots from the devices. How a 1-on-1 chat on Signal got leaked other than by screenshots is beyond me, though. If there is a breach in Signal Protocol, there’s a breach in OMEMO, too, since OMEMO uses Signal Protocol.


  • airikr@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlLinux and Foss Signal Group Chat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Alright. Haha, I filter out Big Tech and far-right shit on Mastodon :P It’s probably because of that. And if some far-right person starts to chat/talk to me, I often ignore him/her. Luckily, that haven’t happen… yet.

    And to comment your first comment further. JD Vance uses Signal, or at least used. There was a massive Signal leak with him involved few months ago.