![](/static/61a827a1/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0da8d285-3457-4e5b-af21-b38609b07eea.webp)
I hope Mozilla can benefit of a good local translation engine that could come out of it as well.
I hope Mozilla can benefit of a good local translation engine that could come out of it as well.
Thank you.
Did you think Amazon didn’t know how Honey operates?
Difficult to prove the latter of course, but out of the two, it’s not what most people seem to be complaining the most about.
You’d need the first one to get big enough to pull up the second one anyways.
That would arguably be even worst.
I’m struggling to understand how everyone thought Honey made money. I have assumed from the first time I saw an ad for them that this is how they operate. It’s not like it’s difficult to prove or disprove either.
Like Lemmy or Mastodon, BlueSky was made with the idea of federation. While BlueSky is not there yet, federated services are inherently very easy to scrape.
Maybe it’s time for people to understand that anything they post/vote/comment/like should be considered public domain.
Don’t just “delete” Twitter as in deleting the app. Please also close your account.
It works on Android, but I don’t believe it works on iOS.
Duckduckgo’s version is so much better. Unlimited aliases for free.
It’s a trade-off, because they often also want their entire article to be crawled by Google.
For that they use iframes, which have a different security system.
Because of the CORS settings on Google’s servers would tell your browser to not go forward with the request. There are two ways it could eventually be possible:
Fair enough, that’s interesting. I assume this only applies to the non-web clients. On the web, it would not be possible. You can verify by looking at the outgoing network requests on this random video for example: https://invidious.privacyredirect.com/watch?v=qKMcKQCQxxI
I’m pretty confident that you are wrong.
Invidious and YouTube piped (and LibreTube) by default load the videos server-side, as opposed to GrayJay, NewPipe or Smarttube.
It has advantages (mostly that your IP address is not shared with YouTube, and it allows users from countries where YouTube is blocked to still access it) and inconvenients (much harder to keep up when YouTube actively seeks to block them).
LibreTube is also a good one. Basically an app for piped
Browsers based on chromium do not have to follow exactly what the main branch is doing. If they want to keep supporting MV2 or support different rules for MV3, they can. Albeit it’s a bit cumbersome.
I know they do, but it’s lacking so many languages.