Right, is it faster including the time it’s taken you to verify that the tests are testing what they should be testing and isn’t just testing the implementation as written?

They ruled that for copyright to apply, a human must have authored the work.

Now if an AI spits out code that’s a duplicate of a humans authored work. Then you could argue the author is actually the original human. And this it would be covered by their original copyright

People who find success can, sometimes, become arrogant and become blind to other factors contributing to their success. Just enough failure can keep you humble. Pretty typical human reactions.

Does it, if you can work on the normal application code, there’s no reason you can’t work on the lower levels of applications. It’s all just code. Ramp up might take a bit more time, but I wouldn’t expect horrendously so. As long as your patterns make sense and what is there is written well enough and is not a spaghetti monster in the making, any one should be able to pick it up.

Time to go back to email lists. Anyone can come along sure. But it’s only going to be the most determined.

I would have thought that you fix it locally, git commit, and regenerate the patch set again. Maybe with optional squashing of commits so each patch set doesn’t keep growing.

The simplest and slowest way when you need to use something from the system clipboard:

Copying: Enter visual mode (v) Highlight the text I want to copy then enter in command mode "+y which basically means “Use a register for following command (”) make it the external clipboard register (+) and yank/copy (y)"

Pasting Move to where I want to paste then enter in command mode "+p to paste after the current position or "+P to paste before the current position

If I don’t need to copy/paste stuff to applications outside of vim, then I can skip the "+ register setting part, and just use the default internal register.

Well, being open minded doesn’t mean you won’t reject something, just that you won’t reject something without mulling it over first. I’m sure their desire to not want to create account is not a flippant remark and a position they arrived at over time.

Another alternative, I’ve been looking at is radicle. It’s private repository stuff is rough, but public repository stuff, much less so. Seems to be early days but I really like what the project is doing.

Well from their site

Moderation

Since there are no global admins, the administrative control of a subplebbit rests solely with its creator. No one else can moderate content or accounts unless the subplebbit creator grants them permission.

So, it’s not that there’s no moderation. It’s just “subplebbit” creator/delegates controlled as there is no over arching site wide company able to moderate it on the whole.

It will mean, as a user, you’ll have to be liberal with removing subplebbits from your own feed though. I’m sure there will be some… not so pleasant subplebbits appearing.