• 4 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 6 days ago
cake
Cake day: August 6th, 2026

help-circle




  • I agree that there is the liability argument to be made that no company wants to deal with regarding food. That’s why they spend the effort to recall products when they find something wrong with them, en masse. That’s why in places like Wal-Mart, responsible associates take damaged food products like dented cans and give them to claims to be proceeded. Because nobody deserves to buy that kind of stuff.

    However, there should be a point where if a grocery store or Wal-Mart for example, know that food product isn’t selling as fast as they thought or that they just aren’t seeing sales for it. Then yeah, they could do something about that than just mindlessly tossing it, like they could strike deals with food banks and charities to give those out with the understanding that they are about to go bad soon.



  • Then what’s the alternative? I’d like to hear this one.

    Because incase you haven’t noticed, ICE and the rich proudly sugarcoat their efforts in exterminating those they don’t like. On a regular basis.

    So, tell me and the rest of the audience here, as to why simply expressing how good it’d be to see those whose actions affect the lives of literal millions and billions for generations to be exposed to some violence, is wrong.

    And I will not accept “because it just isn’t” as an answer.