At least in Germany it’s the same. It gets ignored in the discussions concerning nuclear exit but it’s actually the main reason why I’m not aggressively against it: we have save areas for nuclear storage but those fight bitterly to not have it. The areas which are currently used are… Not good. Paying someone else (such as Finland) is out of budget for both state and energy companies. The latter anyway want to do the running but not the maintenance and the building, state should pay for that.

It’s really white sad for me. The (true) statement that the dangerous waste needs to be stored carefully got corrupted to “it can’t be stored”.

Oh sorry, nvidia RTX :) Thanks!

Lowest price on Ebay for me is 290 Euro :/ The p100 are 200 each though.

Do you happen to know if I could mix a 3700 with a p100?

And thanks for the tips!

And still there are other people than you who want to do that full-time - and in doing so provide, at least for me, more value than the 6ooth marvel billion dollar movie.

There are educators and entertainers out there who chose this as a job and are good at it. If they could live off of it by going the patreon route instead of the shitty YouTube ad spam one I’d be all for it.

You don’t! You observe the result. When no interaction happens the resulting pattern is described well with wave functions. If interaction happens to determine which slit it is traveling through the double line result is seen and can be described by mechanical functions.

This “we have math for both results” for interpreted to “has properties of both wave and particle”. Which I guess was one press release away from n"it’s both and depends on if I’m looking!"

Which of those questions from the article would you describe as loaded enough to imply the quite interesting responses?

I expected to read something like “why are Chinese people stupid?” and then some racist shit - but the answers to those questions are… Interesting.

The bankruptcy scenario is correct but the first part isn’t: you don’t have X shares as collateral that you can liquidate. Instead, you have collateral to cover sum Y.

As long as the collateral contract covers enough stock positions the bank won’t lose.

That said all of this is assuming standard contracts. If y bank wrote “0% interest and instead 50% of the revenue growth of Twitter” then this would be an easy way to lose money.

Haven’t heard of a stupid banker yet, though, so what would the chances be?

Both langchain as well as ollama run locally and are open source.

To be very frank: your post sounds like fear mongering without having even clicked on the link.

I have set up an lts kernel in addition to the zen I use by default. See:

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Kernel

Disclaimer: this only works when something with image creation goes wrong with an update. Which didn’t happen to me ever - unless I did a mistake or tested some kernel stuff. I only had bootloader errors when I screwed up pacman though. The fallback kernel in that case is on a USB stick…

Hehe true. And even that happened to me after a couple of tired “Syu enter”. But then again I learned something new with nearly every repair!

Oh agreed! That’s why I’m with OP actually that arch might not be the right distro to go for.

The person I replied to basically said “that’s what you deserve for not doing it properly” if I understood it correctly - that’s what I’m confused about as well.

What precaution would you expect OP to would’ve done though? A fallback kernel would be my guess - that’s something many casual oriented distro do out of the box basically. . I read your post as “you’re right, don’t use arch” - something btw which I tend to agree with although I wouldn’t say that’s because of the precautions.

I use arch because there’s no black box magic. For an end user who expects or wants that… Yes, arch might not be the right choice.

Just curious, what distro do you use that systemd is not the default? (I at least you didn’t change it after the fact if you don’t have any feelings (towards unit systems ;) ) )

♥! :)

I have to make this nitpick:

“you” are the one keeping you on windows. You decide that those features are more important than any disadvantages.

Which I think is absolutely OK - that’s your choice. Many many people took this choice for a myriad of reasons and are the sum of “windows majority” - and no “I would change if” will perpetuate either feature development on Linux programs nor pressure on Microsoft.