They have no reason to change that. They will long term want the exact same thing that twitter has, access to all user data and control of the platform.
Nobody likes a sucker, especially the kind that fall for fruit tarts like you. I knew there was trouble. I could smell it on the hot evening breeze. Fortunately for me, trouble is my favorite thing… Because I’m Joe Milkshake. I kicked down the door with one swift, decisive motion.
They have no reason to change that. They will long term want the exact same thing that twitter has, access to all user data and control of the platform.
Ah, its always healthcare in US politics, isn’t it.
Are you serious? It’s Microsoft.
That’s a big point that also usually isn’t really distinguished in all these studies, especially the ones about children and screen time.
I feel there are differences between just watching cartoons and playing some involving game.
Also, just walking by a TV that’s on is also screen time, or not? Is the TV running in the background at home screen time when you only look at it 5 minutes here and there?
I’d be happy if those studies would clearly state, 4 hours social media per day is bad. Or 4 hours watching TV with at least 30 minutes long sessions is bad. Stuff like that.
Well yeah. Turns out you are not the average user. Don’t mean that neither as a compliment nor an insult.
Cause you are hard as…
I actually always wondered about the y in old texts. Thanks!
The enforcing part is where this is likely to get shitty. Once they establish this as a law they maybe will try and sue companies that don’t provide an age check on their websites. Now if that is possible I am not sure, seeing as many of those are having HQs in Ireland or Netherlands due to tax reasons.
But if that is successful it would mean they actually have to check everyone’s age by some means, which means collecting IDs. Which definitely is bad news for users, we all know that data won’t be securely stored or deleted.
Not sure how else this could go down.
Pharaos were the OG preppers.
Not an expert so I might be wrong, but as far as I understand it, those specialised tools you describe are not even AI. It is all machine learning. Maybe to the end user it doesn’t matter, but people have this idea of an intelligent machine when its more like brute force information feeding into a model system.
Didn’t smell any is certainly not a good way to measure this. I mean, I am no expert, but surely there is something that can actually put a number to the amount produced.
Maybe they megaloped around?
Doesn’t actively research their mutuals’ races and being so shocked someone isn’t white that you have to make a post about it… does not go quite together for me.
If that’s too complicated for a sentence, dude’s a racist.
https://itsfoss.com/arch-based-linux-distros/
Manjaro for example. I also thought Garuda would be focused on stability but according to this article potentially no. So maybe just Manjaro, I do remember reading about something else like it though…
That’s… a weird take. There are variants of Arch that focus on stability, if that’s what you are after.
Theres a Jesus take the wheel joke in there somewhere
ad