Let me get this straight:

1. Person A makes a social network
2. People flock to it
3. Person A sells the social network to person B
4. Networks does a 180, destroying communitie; people outraged.
5. Same person A makes a social network
6. People flock to it.
7. [surely we can predict what is going to happen here, right?]

The fact that this is an actual possibility is absolutely hilarious.

Couchfucker said what?

That’s juhst gayr propahgandurrr

Weird way to spell “Moron” but ok

You know that I’m not clicking any link that’s posted by an .ml account, right?

Also, that sounds exactly like russia, comrade.

Naw, you’re not the bad guys. You’re the clowns.

Wow, that’s some fucking cherry-picking.

Hmm, I wonder why would someone spend their time collecting headlines with a certain agenda…

russia is not only a joke country, but it’s also a terrorist state that’s held together by fascist drunks.

Yes I want a full-featured documentary about a cute baby hippo. You’re right.

Totally not a joke-country you guys.
Totally normal.

I have the same question, because many mastodon instances are barely keeping up with the costs of hosting pictures + text.

Only shows how easy it would be to “Take” the US by someone with at least half a brain.

Luckily, both Trump and Musk aren’t the sharpest hoes in the shed.

Yes, russians should gtfo of other countries universally.

“Russian” is not a race.

The websites track the planes not the individuals.

The planes might be flying empty. It has nothing to do with GDPR.

Chicken / egg

It’s not a place for lurking, IMO. If you’ve got nothing to offer, don’t expect to get engagement on shitposts and rage-bait.

I personally get more engagement on Mastodon, because I couldn’t please the twitter algorithm. And I have 7 times fewer followers on Masto than I had on twitter.

Organic reach is best reach. Everything else is noise.

deleted by creator

When it comes to teen pregnancies, 1 is 1 too many. ~20% is significant.

[ nostalgia intensifies ]