Last I checked, I’m not free to shoot anyone who isn’t trying to kill me.

Making fun of whites is acceptable because ALL white people are imperialist oppressors that deserve violence. A little jokey-joke is letting them off easy.

/s

Alternatively, saying “beep beep” like a little car horn

“Look how cute I am! Please ignore the embarrassing and obnoxious thing I just did.”

It’s a real shame the first amendment only applies to congress.

They don’t, they’ve been domesticated and trained to allow it.

The role of a government is to collect taxes, then use those taxes to provide the most good to the greatest number of people.

In general, voters will have many ideas as to what that implementation should look like, which is why we elect representatives.

“Do you shit with the door open?”

“Why? Are you hiding something?”

“To make sure you’re not hiding anything, I need you to shit with the door open from now on.”

Eventually, they’ll justify their need for privacy. When they do, agree with them.

I would kill for free dental and free public transport.

That’s good. Because our government would kill us to prevent it.

“Microsoft thinks it has social permission to burn the planet for profit” is all I’m hearing.

Appropriately, the “house rules” that keep the game going longer and make it “more fair” is actually just socialism

Seconding the guy who said you can put whatever you want in a prenup

Insta = Instagram

THOT = That Ho Over There

Prenup = Prenuptual agreement, which is a contract two people sign before they get married, usually to determine who will get what in the event of a divorce. It’s usually used to avoid lengthy and costly divorce proceedings.

Pension = An older type of retirement account

So, that ho on Instagram stayed married to him for two years, fulfilling the terms of their prenuptial agreement, entitling her to full divorce benefits, which will be about half of this guy’s fortune, which should be enough for her to retire on.

Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

THOT = That Ho Over There

It sounds like you and I are in agreement, we’d like to see fewer gun deaths and less gun violence in the US. At the end of the day, I think you’ll have a hard time finding anyone who disagrees with that sentiment.

It sounds like we also agree, whatever measures are passed, we’d like them to be effective at taking guns out of the hands of those who would do harm with them.

The reason I oppose a ban is, bans disproportionately affect law-abiding gun owners, and the overwhelming majority (over 99%) of gun owners in the US abide by the law and commit no crimes with their guns. Bans overwhelmingly succeed at disarming responsible owners who had no bad intentions in the first place, and overwhelmingly fail at disarming the criminals at whom the bans are targeted.

Additionally, there are about 5-6 guns per US gun-owner. The logistics of safely locating, safely confiscating, and safely disposing of all of those guns in a way that doesn’t end up with them on the black market, is not a problem I think anyone has a good way to solve currently. I assert, the logistics of addressing societal factors that contribute to violence are much simpler, better understood, and more achievable.

European countries also do more to address the root causes of violence, poverty, drug addiction, mental health, and homelessness.

I think the differences in the way these societal factors are addressed more than explains the observed difference in levels of violence.

I believe a much more effective means of addressing violence in a country involves addressing the root causes of that violence, as opposed to banning the means of violence.

Banning the means only prevents violence when no means exist; addressing the root causes prevents violence, despite whatever means may exist.

I’m guessing police don’t fall into your definition of “regular people”. Like I said, police-involved shootings count as “mass shootings”.

If a cop shoots and hits two bad guys, that counts as a mass shooting. If a bad guy wounds a cop and his partner kills the bad guy, that counts as a mass shooting. If two people attempt to mug an old lady and she shoots them both, that’s a mass shooting.

I think most people would agree, those three scenarios aren’t what comes to mind when the phrase “mass shooting” is used, and I think most people would agree, these aren’t the scenarios we want to be putting a stop to.

Ask your doctor about Viagra.

Failing that, buy a house with thick walls, far away from neighbors, play your game only when the house is empty, try not to hurt yourself, and happy tugging.

I know, right? And entire engine developed from the ground up, just to be used on one game and never again. Such a shame. Fuck Konami.

I love the gameplay, but it’s SO obvious Kojima couldn’t cut it as a film maker so he created video games with feature film length cut scenes instead.

Liquid gets his arm chopped off, then he attaches Ocelot’s arm to himself, then Ocelot’s arm takes over Liquid’s body, and that was Ocelot’s plan the entire time? WHAT??

Don’t even get me started on Raiden and Vamp.