Soldiers didn’t murder that unarmed civilian, AI did.

Soldier did the (rough) aiming.
Soldier pulled the trigger.

Still hard to blame AI for it, don’t you think?

Oh but I don’t need to think too much through it. It is pretty much the legal situation in Germany (and probably several other European countries). There may be some edge cases that I don’t know.

Of course, if you send stuff to me, then you are the first of the evil ones :) and if I can convince the judge that I did not know and did not want (!) the stuff (and by the way, how did they even know about it? Even before I had the chance to delete it?), there will be room for a reasonable decision.

Ireally don’t want to give my personal information to apple if I can avoid it…

The bad news is… drums rolling…

You can’t become an Apple developer that way.

You will give them your true personal information, as well as your beliefs and your immortal soul… 😉

researchers concluded that “outlawing all deepfakes is unrealistic and unfeasible”—especially since all the harmful AI-generated images that are already out there are likely to “remain online indefinitely.”

Just think a little bigger:

It must be a crime to have the harmful material.

Have it on your PC or phone —> goto jail.
Have it in your online account —> goto jail.
Be a service provider and have it on your server —> goto jail.

This will reduce the stuff.

the claims against Meta expire at the end of this year, so users would have to act quickly — by filing a lawsuit and proving they were victims of the incident

This is somewhat misleading.

They have to file their claim before the end of the year. But then they can add the proof later.

They usually request data that can be obtained from their business data, bookkeeping etc. Doing such a survey work shouldn’t be neccessary for answering the EU’s questions.

IMHO it smells.

Google is doing this to provide data on the impact this will make for these publishers

Read: trying to threaten them.

You should understand that Chinese people or companies have no choice there. It is not exactly a free world. As soon as they are asked by their authorities, they can only say yes.

(But it’s not quite different in Usa with their so called national security letters)

deleted by creator

That “fleet” would need many significant differences, like when you recognize different people, then many features are different. If your grandma talks to you with a different tone, you would still recognize your grandma easily.

The Grandma-Honeypot LOL

But I don’t believe in it. If I were the scammer, I would have maybe 2 or 3 of these lengthy talks with “her”, but afterwards I would recognize her and of course avoid her anytime.

No, I’m not saying anything about ‘should’.

It’s about a lawsuit here, and I have told that this may be what has violated the law.

The court will tell you for sure, in the end.

Mind that news media don’t pay

That’s exactly what (maybe) violates the law.

They want to sell the cake and eat it too…

Or they want to sell the cake and get paid for it.

there are a limited “number of slots” available for this special offer.

TIL this is also called “slots” 😉

These products are also used among their enterprise customers. So they cannot simply abandon them. But customers are not paying directly for these products (only for the server software). So they make them free. Maybe they hope to lower maintenance costs.

The higher plan must be to maintain good morale among the existing customers, and maybe slow down or even stop their exodus.

But the mob is already running away from them.

Does anybody think it can be stopped?

Which party is that?

;-)

Commercial

The orange dickhead is not yet at his new place, but the asshole followers are already raging :(